Preview

Lomonosov Geography Journal

Advanced search

Spatial Patterns of Net Migration in the Suburbs of Russian Regional Centers

Abstract

Net migration at the municipal level in Russia varies significantly, both in positive or negative values and the size. The majority of Russia’s regional centres are experiencing positive net migration. Population size and migration attractiveness of a regional centre appear to be critical determinants for the positive spillover effect on the net migration in its suburbs. The paper aims to validate the hypothesis by the case of 63 urban okrugs (core areas) and their outer zones, which include 75 urban okrugs, 12 intra-urban territories of Moscow outside the Moscow Ring Road, 388 urban and 2973 rural settlements. The study is primarily based on the municipallevel statistics database of the Rosstat (BD PMO). The following indicators were used: administrative data on net migration for 2015–2019, population of the studied municipal units, the shortest centre-to-centre distance by existing roads from regional capital to each municipality in its suburban area (km). The values of average net migration rate were calculated and analyzed for 2015–2019.
The net migration rate for core areas averaged 4.3 ‰. Its value is higher in suburban areas at the distance of up to 40 km from the centre of regional capital. A steady migration decline is observed from a distance of 65 km. These boundaries extend further for metropolitan areas with a larger core. As the distance from the regional capital increases, both the number of municipal units with positive net migration and their share in the total population decrease.
Net migration values in the suburbs are higher than in regional capitals, and there are a few municipal units with an ultra-high, “explosive” rate providing for higher average values. Such areas are located in the immediate vicinity of the capitals and most commonly have relatively small “base” population.
The gap in net migration rate between regional capitals and suburban municipal units, as well as the spatial localization of positive growth rate in the suburbs, indicates the peculiarity of suburban processes in Russia. The nearest suburbs become a part of contiguous urbanized area of a regional capital beyond its administrative boundaries, providing the opportunities for extensive growth of a city.

About the Authors

L. B. Karachurina
Higher School of Economics, Vishnevsky Institute of Demography
Russian Federation

Associate Professor, Ph.D. in Geography



N. V. Mkrtchyan
Higher School of Economics, Vishnevsky Institute of Demography
Russian Federation

Leading Scientifi c Researcher, Ph.D. in Geography



A. N. Petrosian
Higher School of Economics, Vishnevsky Institute of Demography
Russian Federation

Master Student



References

1. Antonov E.V., Makhrova A.G. Largest Urban Agglomerations and forms of settlement pattern at the Supra-Agglomeration level in Russia, Regional Research of Russia, 2019, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 370–382, DOI: 10.1134/S2079970519040038.

2. Bramley G., Power S. Urban form and social sustainability: The role of density and housing type, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2009, no. 36(1), p. 30–48, DOI: 10.1068/b33129.

3. Breslavsky A.S. «Prigorodnaya revolyutsiya» v regional’nom sreze (Ulan-Ude) [“Suburban Revolution”: the regional case (Ulan-Ude)], Krest’yanovedenie, 2017, no. 2(1), p. 90–101, DOI: 10.22394/2500-1809-2017-2-1-90-101. (In Russian)

4. Burdyak A. Suburbanizatsiya v Rossii: reshaet li dacha kvartirnyi vopros? [Suburbanization in Russia: is Dacha a Solution to the Housing Problem?], Ekonomicheskaya politika, 2013, no. 2, p. 82–96. (In Russian)

5. Dmitriyev M., Misikhina S. Rynok zhil’ya Moskovskoi aglomeratsii: vyzovy dlya naseleniya i ekonomicheskoi politiki [Housing market in the Moscow region: a challenge for the population and economic policy], Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 2016, no. 4, p. 78–88. (In Russian)

6. Dokhov R.A., Sinitsyn N.A. Sprawl in Russia: growth and structural transformation of the Belgorod suburbs], Regional Research of Russia, 2020, no. 2, p. 247–259.

7. Dorofeeva L.A. Razvitie prigorodnykh poselkov v Krasnoyarskoi aglomeratsii [The development of suburban settlements in the Krasnoyarsk agglomeration], Geografiya i prirodnye resursy, 2016, no. 3, p. 168–174, DOI: 10.21782/GiPR0206-1619-2016-3(168-174). (In Russian)

8. Ewing R., Hamidi S. Compactness versus Sprawl: A Review of Recent Evidence from the United States, Journal of Planning Literature, 2015, no. 30(4), p. 413–432, DOI: 10.1177/0885412215595439.

9. Galster G., Hanson R., Ratcliffe M.R., Wolman H., Coleman S., Freihage J. Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept, Housing Policy Debate, 2001, no. 12(4), p. 681–717, DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2001.9521426.

10. Gareev I.F., Khafizov A.F., Mukhametova N.N., Khusnutdinov F.F., Efimova A.A. Issledovanie potrebnosti naseleniya Kazanskoi aglomeratsii v sovremennykh ob”ektakh maloetazhnogo stroitel’stva [Research on the needs of the Kazan agglomeration population in modern low-rise construction facilities], Zhilishchnye strategii, 2020, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 97–126, DOI: 10.18334/zhs.7.1.100951. (In Russian)

11. Glezer O.B. Neprekrashchayushchayasya munitsipal’naya reforma v Rossii i novatsii 2014–2015 gg. [Continuous municipal reform in Russia and innovations of 2014–2015], Rossiya 2016. Ezhegodnyi doklad Franko-rossiiskogo analiticheskogo tsentra Observo, Moscow, Observo Publ. 2016, p. 373–386. (In Russian)

12. Grigorichev K.V. Mnogoobrazie prigoroda: suburbanizatsiya v Sibirskom regione (sluchai Irkutska) [Diversity of the suburb: suburbanization in Siberian region (the case of Irkutsk)], Gorodskie issledovaniya i praktiki, 2016, no. 1 (2), p. 7–23, DOI: 10.17323/usp1220167-23. (In Russian)

13. Karachurina L., Mkrtchyan N. Age-specific migration in regional centers and peripheral areas of Russia, Comparative Population Studies, 2019, no. 44, p. 413–446, DOI: 10.12765/CPoS-2020-12en.

14. Kley S. Explaining the Stages of Migration within a Lifecourse Framework, European Sociological Review, 2011, no. 27(4), p. 469–486, DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcq020.

15. Kurichev N.K., Kuricheva E.K. Migration and investment activity of residents of Russian cities in the housing market of Moscow agglomeration, Regional Research of Russia, 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 213–224, DOI: 10.1134/S2079970519030079.

16. Kuricheva E.K., Popov A.A. Housing construction dynamics in the 2010s as a factor of transformation of the Moscow agglomeration, Regional Research of Russia, 2016, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 104–116, DOI: 10.1134/S207997051601007X.

17. Lopez R., Hynes H.P. Sprawl in the 1990s: Measurement, distribution, and trends, Urban Affairs Review, 2003, no. 38(3), p. 325–355, DOI: 10.1177/1078087402238805.

18. Makhrova A.G., Kirillov P.L., Bochkarev A.N. Work commuting in the Moscow agglomeration: estimating commuting flows using mobile operator data, Regional Research of Russia, 2017, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 36–44, DOI: 10.1134/S2079970517010051.

19. Makhrova A.G., Medvedev A.A., Nefedova T.G. Sadovodachnye poselki gorozhan v sisteme sel’skogo rasseleniya [Gardening and dacha communities of urban dwellers in the rural settlement system], Vestn. Mosk. un-ta, Ser. 5, Geogr., 2016, no. 2, p. 64–74. (In Russian)

20. Makhrova A.G., Nefedova T.G., Treivish A.I. Moskovskaya oblast’ segodnya i zavtra: tendentsii i perspektivy prostranstvennogo razvitiya [Moscow region today and tomorrow: trends and perspectives of spatial development], Moscow, Novyi khronograf Publ., 2008, 344 p. (In Russian)

21. Mkrtchyan N.V. Migratsiya v Moskve i Moskovskoi oblasti: regional’nye i strukturnye osobennosti [Migration in Moscow and Moscow region: regional and structural characteristics], Regional’nye issledovaniya, 2015, no. 3, p. 107–116. (In Russian)

22. Morrill R. Aging in place, age specific migration and natural decrease, The Annals of Regional Science, 1995, no. 29, p. 41–66, DOI: 10.1007/BF01580362.

23. Randolph B., Tice A. Who Lives in Higher Density Housing? A Study of Spatially Discontinuous Housing Sub-markets in Sydney and Melbourne, Urban Studies, 2013, no. 50(13), p. 2661–2681, DOI: 10.1177/0042098013477701.

24. Schmidt S., Fina S., Siedentop S. Post-socialist Sprawl: A Cross-Country Comparison, European Planning Studies, 2015, no. 23(7), p. 1357–1380, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2014.933178.

25. Baza dannyh pokazatelej municipal’nyh obrazovanij Rossii. Rosstat [Database of indicators of municipalities of Russia. Rosstat], URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/munst.htm (access date 06.02.2021).

26. Chislennost’ naselenija Rossijskoj Federacii po municipal’nym obrazovanijam, Bjulleten’ Rosstata. 2015–2020 [Population of the Russian Federation by municipalities: information and analytical materials. Rosstat Bulletin. 2015–2020], URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/compendium/document/13282 (access date 06.02.2021).

27. Makhrova A.G., Kirillov P.L. Rossiiskaya urbanizatsiya i zhil’e gorozhan [Russian urbanization and urban housing], Demosсope Weekly, no. 645–646, URL: http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2015/0645/tema01.php (access date 06.02.2021).

28. Raschet rasstojanij mezhdu gorodami. Avtodispetcher [Calculation of distances between cities. Auto dispatcher.], URL: https://www.avtodispetcher.ru/distance/ (access date 06.02.2021).


Review

For citations:


Karachurina L.B., Mkrtchyan N.V., Petrosian A.N. Spatial Patterns of Net Migration in the Suburbs of Russian Regional Centers. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5, Geografiya. 2021;(6):123-134. (In Russ.)

Views: 911


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0579-9414 (Print)