TERRITORIAL CONFLICTS AND FUNCTION OF THE PLACE (CASE STUDY OF THE BOROVSK DISTRICT OF THE KALUGA REGION)
Abstract
Specific features of the transformation of the socio-economic space of territories located in the marginal zones of influence of large agglomerations are considered on the example of the Borovsk district of the Kaluga region and the Satino training grounds, the area of traditional training of the students of the MSU Faculty of Geography. Shifts in the territorial structure of the region are evaluated basing on the concepts of the economic-geographical situation, the function of the place and the diffusion of innovations. The main types of conflicts that arise as a result of competition of the main functions are identified: agrarian, industrial-infrastructural, recreational, environmental, residential and special. The current stage of the district development is characterized by increasing competition of functions for the territory and other resources, which is due to their intensive development, primarily in the eastern part of the region, and also by moving beyond or, on the contrary, drawing near the borders of the Moscow region new investment projects of just indirect relation to the interests of the district. Conflicts of functions are exacerbated against the backdrop of contradictory processes occurring in the territorial organization of the population: complication of its spatio-temporal organization and polarization of the interests of its various groups. The absence of a well-thought-out functional zoning gradually leads to the formation of a sustainable, difficultly amenable strip land use, which in the future can lead to degradation of the most valuable functions of the territory.
About the Authors
V. L Baburin
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Faculty of Geography, Department of Economic and Social Geography of Russia, Professor, D.Sc. in Geography
G. I. Gladkevich
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Faculty of Geography, Department of Economic and Social Geography of Russia, Associate Professor, PhD. in Geography
Russian Federation
Faculty of Geography, Department of Economic and Social Geography of Russia, Associate Professor, PhD. in Geography
A. I. Danshin
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Faculty of Geography, Department of Economic and Social Geography of Russia, Associate Professor, PhD. in Geography
Russian Federation
Faculty of Geography, Department of Economic and Social Geography of Russia, Associate Professor, PhD. in Geography
M. S. Savoskul
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Faculty of Geography, Department of Economic and Social Geography of Russia, Associate Professor, D.Sc. in Geography
Russian Federation
Faculty of Geography, Department of Economic and Social Geography of Russia, Associate Professor, D.Sc. in Geography
S. G. Safronov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Faculty of Geography, Department of Economic and Social Geography of Russia, Associate Professor, PhD. in Geography
Russian Federation
Faculty of Geography, Department of Economic and Social Geography of Russia, Associate Professor, PhD. in Geography
References
1. Alaev Je.B. Social’no-jekonomicheskaja geografija: ponjatijnoterminologicheskij slovar’ [Socio-economic geography: conceptualterminological dictionary]. M.: Mysl’, 1983. 350 s. (in Russian).
2. Alekseev A.I. Jekonomiko-geograficheskoe izuchenie i prognozirovanie sel’skogo rasselenija. [Economic-geographical study and forecasting of rural settlement pattern]. Dis. … kand. geogr. n. M., 1975. 161 s. (in Russian)
3. Alekseev A.I., Hromov P.S., Shuvalov V.E. Materialy geograficheskih issledovanij Satinskogo uchebnogo poligona i smezhnyh territorij v bassejne Srednej Protvy [Materials of geographical studies of the Satino training ground and adjacent territories in the Middle Protva River basin] / Results of Economic and Geographical Research 1972-74. M.: VINITI, 1980. Iss. IV. 30 s. (in Russian).
4. Amerikanskaya geografiya. Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektiv [American geography. Current state and prospects] / Sost. P. Dzhems, K. Dzhons. M., 1957 (in Russian).
5. Armand D.L. Nauka o landshafte. [The Landscape Science]. M.: Mysl’, 1975. 288 s. (in Russian).
6. Baburin V.L., Bass I.M., Manakov A.G. Izmenenie funkcii mesta kak put’ intensifikacii razvitija Moskovskogo regiona. [Change of the function of a place as a way of intensification of the Moscow region development] // Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 5: Geografija. 1987. № 4. S. 24–27 (in Russian).
7. Baranskij N.N. Jekonomiko-geograficheskoe polozhenie. [Economic-geographical position] // Stanovlenie sovetskoj jekonomicheskoj geografii: Izbrannye trudy. M.: Mysl’, 1980. S. 128–159 (in Russian).
8. Bunge V. Teoreticheskaja geografija [Theoretical Geography] / Pod red. V.M. Gohman. M.: Progress, 1967. 281 s. (in Russian).
9. Dzhonston R.D. Geografiya i geografy: Ocherk razvitiya angloamer. social. geografii posle 1945 g. [Geography and geographers: Sketch of the development of the Anglo-Amer. social geography after 1945] / R.Dzh. Dzhonston; Per. s angl. N.M. Alaevoj; Pod red. E.B. Alaeva; [Poslesl. S. Lavrova]. M. Progress, 1987. 367 s. (in Russian).
10. Geografija, obshhestvo, okruzhajushhaja sreda. T. V. Geografija social’no-jekonomicheskogo razvitija [Geography, society, environment. T. V. Geography of socio-economic development] / Pod red.: A.I. Alekseeva, N.S. Mironenko. M.: Izd. dom «Gorodec», 2004. 672 s. (in Russian).
11. Gluhov A.I. Toponimicheskij palimpsest Satinskoj uchebnonauchnoj stancii. [Toponymic palimpsest of the Satino educationalscientific station] // Tezisy doklada na Satinskom seminare (rukopis’). M., 2017 (in Russian).
12. Guseva E.S. Transformacija funkcij sel’skoj mestnosti Podmoskov’ja za 20 let rynochnyh preobrazovanij. [Transformation of the functions of rural areas of the Moscow region during 20 years of market transformation] // Regional’nye issledovanija. 2012. № 2. C. 47–58 (in Russian).
13. Hartshorne R. Perspective on the Nature of Geography. 2012. 210 р. Holdsworth D.W. Historical geography: the ancients and the moderns-generational vitality // Progress in Human Geography. 2002. № 26. P. 671–678.
14. Ivanov Yu.G., Sheveleva T.I. Municipal «noe zemel» noe pravo.[ Municipal land law] M., 1998. 45 s. (in Russian).
15. Kochurov B.I. Еkodiagnostika i sbalansirovannoe razvitie. [Ecodiagnostics and balanced development]. Smolensk, 2003. 380 s. (in Russian).
16. Kovalev S.A. Sel’skoe rasselenie (geograficheskoe issledovanie). [Rural settlement pattern (geographical study)]. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1963 (in Russian).
17. Mahrova A.G., Nefedova T.G., Trejvish A.I. Moskovskaja oblast’ segodnja i zavtra: tendencii i perspektivy prostranstvennogo razvitija. [Moscow region today and tomorrow: trends and prospects of spatial development]. M.: Novyj hronograf, 2008. 344 s. (in Russian).
18. Mincz A.A., Preobrazhenskij V.S. Funkcija mesta i ee izmenenie [Function of the plsce and its change] // Izv. AN SSSR. Ser. Geografija. 1970. № 6. S. 118–131 (in Russian).
19. Mironenko N.S., Denisencev A.S. O politicheskoj geokonfliktologii kak oblasti geograficheskogo znanija. [About political geoconflictology as a field of geographical knowledge] // Problems of geoconflictology. M.: Press-Solo, 2004. V. 1. S. 12–24.
20. Morill R.L. Prostranstvennaja organizacija obshhestva [The spatial organization of society], 1970. 251 s. (in Russian).
21. Preobrazhenskij V.S. Landshaftnye issledovanija. [Landscape studies]. M., 1966. 128 s. (in Russian).
22. Rodoman B.B. Poljarizovannaja biosfera. [Polarized biosphere]. Smolensk: Ojkumena, 2002. 336 s. (in Russian).
23. Saushkin Ju.G. Jekonomicheskaja geografija: istorija, teorija, metody, praktika. [Economic geography: history, theory, methods, practice]. M.: Mysl’, 1973. 559 s. (in Russian).
24. Zamjatina N.Ju. Principy sozdanija obraza mesta. [Principles of creating the image of a place] // Geografija i jekologija v shkole XXI veka. 2004. № 2. S. 3–11 (in Russian).
25. Zubarevich N.V. Transformacija sel’skogo rasselenija i seti uslug v sel’skoj mestnosti [Transformation of rural settlement pattern and the network of services in rural areas] // Izv. RAN. Ser. geograficheskaja. 2013. № 3. S. 26–38 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Baburin V.L., Gladkevich G.I., Danshin A.I., Savoskul M.S., Safronov S.G. TERRITORIAL CONFLICTS AND FUNCTION OF THE PLACE (CASE STUDY OF THE BOROVSK DISTRICT OF THE KALUGA REGION). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5, Geografiya. 2018;(6):72-82. (In Russ.)
Views:
1131
Email this article 
