FRAGMENTATION OF FORESTS IN THE UPPER PART OF THE VORSKLA RIVER BASIN SINCE THE END OF THE 18TH CENTURY
Abstract
The article deals with the history of forest fragmentation in the upper part of the Vorskla River basin. A quantitative assessment of the degree of forest fragmentation for three time periods (the end of the 18th century, the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 21st century) was performed for the area. Landscape reconstruction for the 16th century (after Yu.G.Chendev), i.e before the active economic development of the territory), was considered as a reference situation. Data on forest distribution in the past were obtained from old maps. The recent forest coverage was mapped using the Landsat satellite images. The results of the study show a trend of increasing forest fragmentation over time. In the course of development the areas of intense fragmentation gradually shifted downstream the Vorskla River and its tributaries. This was accompanied by the splitting of forest stands, the decrease of forest area and the growing indentation of their boundaries. The processes determined the present-day pattern of forests in the basin of the Vorskla River, formed under the combination of natural factors and the active economic activities.
About the Authors
P. A. UkrainskijRussian Federation
Faculty of Mining and Natural Resource Management, Federal and regional centre for aerospace and ground monitoring of objects and natural resources Junior Scientific Researcher, PhD. in Geography
E. A. Terekhin
Russian Federation
Faculty of Mining and Natural Resource Management, Federal and regional centre for aerospace and ground monitoring of objects and natural resources Senior Scientific Researcher, PhD. in Geography
Ya. V. Pavlyuk
Russian Federation
Faculty of Mining and Natural Resource Management, Federal and regional centre for aerospace and ground monitoring of objects and natural resources, Junior Scientific Researcher
References
1. Baumann M., Ozdogan M., Kuemmerle T., Wendland K.J., Esipova E., Radeloff V.C. Using the Landsat record to detect forest-cover changes during and after the collapse of the Soviet Union in the temperate zone of European Russia // Remote Sensing of Environment. 2012. V. 124. P. 174–184.
2. Biatov A.P., Ukrainskiy P.A., Narozhnyaya A.G. Sravnitel’nyy analiz fragmentirovannosti landshaftov belgorodskoy chasti basseyna Vorskly i Merly (Khar’kovskaya oblast’, Ukraina) [Comparative analysis of landscape fragmentation in the Vorskla and the Merla river (Kharkov region, Ukraine)] // Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Estestvennye nauki. 2014. V. 26(3). Р. 157–165 (in Russian).
3. Chendev Yu.G., Petin A.N., Serikova E.V., Kramchaninov N.N. Degradatsiya geosistem Belgorodskoy oblasti v rezul’tate khozyaystvennoy deyatel’nosti [Degradation of geosystems in the Belgorod region as a result of the economic activities] // Geografiya i prirodnye resursy, 2008. N 4. P. 69–75 (in Russian)
4. Chendev Yu.G., Aleksandrovskiy A.L., Khokhlova O.S., Smirnova L.G., Novykh L.L., Dolgikh A.V. Antropogennaya evolyutsiya serykh lesostepnykh pochv v yuzhnoy chasti Srednerusskoy vozvyshennosti [Anthropogenic evolution of dark gray forest-steppe soils in the southern part of the Central Russian Upland] // Pochvovedenie, 2011. N 1. P. 3–15 (in Russian).
5. Dulamsuren C., Hauck M., Muhlenberg M. Vegetation at the taiga forest-steppe borderline in the western Khentey Mountains, northern Mongolia // Annales Botanici Fennici. 2005. V. 42(6). P. 411–426.
6. Fahrig L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity // Annual review of ecology, evolution and systematic. 2003. V. 34. P. 487–515.
7. Fietz J., Tomiuk J., Loeschcke V., Weis-Dootz T., Segelbacher G. Genetic consequences of forest fragmentation for a highly specialized arboreal mammal-the Edible Dormouse // PLoS ONE. 2014. V. 9(2). e88092. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088092
8. Fischer J., Lindenmayer D.B. Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis // Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2007. V. 16(3). P. 265–280.
9. Forman R.T.T. Land Mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, 632 p.
10. Goleusov P.V., Lisetskii F.N. Soil development in anthropogenically disturbed forest-steppe landscapes // Eurasian Soil Science. 2008. V. 41(13). P. 1480–1486.
11. Goroshko O.A. Red-crowned Cranes on the Russian-Chinese Argun River and neighboring parts of the Daurian steppes // Chinese Birds. 2012. V. 3(3). P. 231–238.
12. Gusev A.P. Prostranstvenno-vremennye izmeneniya struktury landshaftov yugo-vostoka Belorussii i ikh ekologicheskie posledstviya (na primere invaziy rasteniy) [Spatial and temporal changes in the structure of landscapes south-east of Belarus and their ecological consequences (on example invasive plants)] // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Geografiya. Geoekologiya, 2014, no 1, pp. 18–23 (in Russian).
13. Hauck M., Javkhlan S., Lkhagvadorj D., Bayartogtokh B., Dulamsuren C., Leuschner C. Edge and land-use effects on epiphytic lichen diversity in the forest-steppe ecotone of the Mongolian Altai // Flora – Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants. 2012. V. 207(6). P. 450–458.
14. Jaeger J. Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation // Landscape Ecology. 2000. V. 15. P. 115–130.
15. Khoroshev A.V., Puzachenko Yu.G., D’yakonov K.N. Sovremennoe sostoyanie landshaftnoy ekologii [Recent stage of the landscape ecology] // Izvestiya Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Seriya geograficheskaya, 2006, no 5, pp. 12–21 (in Russian).
16. Kotlyarova E.G., Cherniavskih V.I., Dumacheva E.V. Ecologically Safe Architecture of Agrolandscape is basis for sustainable development // Sustainable Agriculture Research. 2012. V. 2(2). P. 11–23.
17. Kravtsova V.I., Loshkareva A.R. Issledovanie severnoy granitsy lesa po kosmicheskim snimkam raznogo razresheniya [Study of the northern forest line using space imagery of different resolutions] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, 2010. N 6. P. 49– 57 (in Russian).
18. Kuz’menko Ya.V., Lisetskiy F.N., Kirilenko Zh.A., Grigor’eva O.I. Obespechenie optimal’noy vodookhrannoy lesistosti pri basseynovoy organizatsii prirodopol’zovaniya [Providing the optium water protection forests amount at basin organization of nature management] // Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 2013, V. 15(3–2). P. 652–657 (in Russian).
19. Lisetskii F.N., Zemlyakova A.V., Terekhin E.A., Naroznyaya A.G., Pavlyuk Ya.V., Ukrainskii P.A., Kirilenko Zh.A., Marinina O.A., Samofalova O.M. New Opportunities of Geoplanning in the Rural Area With The Implementing of Geoinformational Technologies and Remote Sensing // Adv. Environ. Biol. 2014. N 8(10). P. 536– 539.
20. Makeeva B.M., Malyuchenko O.P., Leont’eva O.A. Otsenka sostoyaniya genofonda prirodnykh populyatsiy pozvonochnykh zhivotnykh v usloviyakh fragmentirovannogo landshafta Moskvy i Podmoskov’ya (na primere burykh lyagushek) [Evaluation of the state of the gene pool of natural populations dwelling in the fragmented landscape of Moscow and Moscow region (with special reference to brown frogs)] // Genetika, 2006, V. 42. N 5. P. 628– 642 (in Russian).
21. McGarigal K., Marks B.J. FRAGSTATS – Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Portland: USDA Forest Service General, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 1995. 134 p.
22. Mikheeva A.I. Prostranstvennaya izmenchivost’ polozheniya verkhney granitsy lesa v Khibinakh (po materialam distantsionnogo zondirovaniya) [Spatial variability of the forest line in the Khibiny Mountains (based on remote sensing materials)] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. 2010, no 4, pp. 18–22 (in Russian).
23. Mikhno V.B. Landshaftnye osobennosti insulyarnosti dubrav srednerusskoy lesostepi [Landscape features of oak forests insularity in the central Russian part of forest-steppe] // Vestnik VGU. Seriya: Geografiya. Geoekologiya, 2012. N 1. P. 14–20 (in Russian).
24. Oehmichen K., Köhl M. Weiterentwicklung von Indikatoren zur Erfassung der Fragmentierung von Wäldern unter Berücksichtigung der Datenverfügbarkeit: Arbeitsbericht. N 2006/2. Hamburg: Instituts für Weltforstwirtschaft, 2006. 41 p.
25. Ripperger S.P., Tschapka M., Kalko E.K.V., Rodriguez-Herrera B., Mayer F. Life in a mosaic landscape: anthropogenic habitat fragmentation affects genetic population structure in a frugivorous bat species // Conservation Genetics. 2013. V. 14(5). P. 925–934.
26. Soulé M.E., Mackey B.G., Recher H.F., Williams J.E., Woinarski J.C.Z., Driscoll D., Dennison W.C., Jones M.E. The role of connectivity in Australian conservation // Pacific Conservation Biology. 2004. V. 10. P. 266–279.
27. Terekhin E.A. Primenenie dannykh sputnikovoy s”emki dlya analiza mnogoletnikh izmeneniy v lesakh Belgorodskoy oblasti [Using remote sensing data for the analysis of long-term changes in the forests of the Belgorod region] // Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondi-rovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2013. V.10 (2), pp. 70–80 (in Russian).
28. Terekhin E.A. Metodika poiska effektivnykh spektral’nykh indeksov dlya avtomati-zirovannogo deshifrirovaniya vodnykh ob”ektov (na primere Belgorodskoy oblasti) [The procedure of seeking effective spectral indices for automated interpretation of water bodies (a case study of Belgorod oblast)] // Geografiya i prirodnye resursy, 2013, no 3, pp. 132–138 (in Russian).
29. Titova S.V., Kobyakov K.N., Zolotukhin N.I., Polyakov A.V. Belogor’ye bez belykh gor? Ugrozy stepnym ekosistemam v Belgorodskoy oblasti [Belogorie without White Mountains? Threats to steppe ecosystems in the Belgorod region] / Pod red. A.A. Tishkova. M., 2014. 40 s.
30. Usova I.P. Otsenka fragmentatsii lesov s ispol’zovaniem landshaftnykh indeksov (na primere vostochno-belorusskoy landshaftnoy provintsii) [Assessment of forest fragmentation using landscape indices (on example the Eastern Belarusian landscape area)] // Aktual’nye problemy geobotaniki: materialy III Vserossiyskoy shkola-konferentsii. II chast’. Petrozavodsk: KarNTs RAN, 2007. P. 250–253 (in Russian).
31. Viktorov A. S. Risunok landshafta [Pattern of landscape]. M.: Mysl’, 1986. 179 p. (in Russian).
32. Wade T.G., Riitters K.H., Wickham J.D., Jones K.B. Distribution and causes of global forest fragmentation // Conservation Ecology. 2003. V. 7(2). Data Views 22.06.2014 www.ecologyandsociety.org/ vol7/iss2/art7/.
33. Walz U., Krüger T., Schumacher U. Fragmentierung von Wäldern in Deutschland – neue Indikatoren zur Flächennutzung // Natur und Landschaft. 2013. V. 88(3). P. 118–127.
34. Watts K., Handley P. Developing a functional connectivity indicator to detect change in fragmented landscapes // Ecological Indicators. 2010. V. 10. P. 552–557.
35. Wu J. Ecological dynamics in fragmented landscapes: Princeton guide to ecology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009. P. 438–444.
Review
For citations:
Ukrainskij P.A., Terekhin E.A., Pavlyuk Ya.V. FRAGMENTATION OF FORESTS IN THE UPPER PART OF THE VORSKLA RIVER BASIN SINCE THE END OF THE 18TH CENTURY. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5, Geografiya. 2017;1(1):82-91. (In Russ.)