Preview

Lomonosov Geography Journal

Advanced search

Differences between the countries of the world in overall productivity

Abstract

Multifactor productivity, which compares the output to the amount of combined inputs used to produce goods and services, is considered the main source of differences in economic development between countries. However, the scientific consensus is based on estimates that neglected the contribution of inputs not related to living or embodied labor, i.e. the services of natural capital. In addition, estimates for Russia rarely decompose differences in its level of productivity from other countries into efficiency components. The article estimates differences between the countries in how productively they use labor and fixed capital to generate income not related to the exploitation of natural resources. We used the indicators from the Penn World Tables for 1995– 2019, developed for international comparisons, and the Fare-Primont transitive productivity indexes. Their decomposition made it possible to indicate the sources of Russia’s lagging behind other countries in productivity. Russia’s low productivity is not related to the level of its capital-labor ratio. With the same proportion of labor inputs and flow of capital services, Russia’s income would be twice as high if its technical efficiency is at the level of Poland, Bulgaria or Turkey. The growth of Russia’s technical efficiency could be facilitated not by focusing on R&D or investments in fixed assets, but by removing obstacles to the assimilation of already known technologies and supporting training programs or exchange of experience. The contribution of productivity to explaining differences between countries in labor incomes (not related to the exploitation of natural resources) was low prior to the 2007–2008 global financial crisis. This indicates distortions in the distribution of labor within countries or reflects wrong estimates of capital value and therefore flow of its services (stock market bubble). In the post-crisis years, productivity has come to explain much of the difference between countries in non-resource income. 

About the Author

K. V. Rostislav
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Institute of Applied Economic Research, Spatial Economics Centre, Laboratory for Infrastructure and Spatial Studies, Researcher



References

1. Baburin V.L., Rostislav K.V. Izmenenie sovokupnoi proizvoditel’nosti faktorov rossiiskikh regionov v 2008– 2016 gg. [Total factor productivity changes in Russian regions in 2008–2016], Journal of New Economy, 2019, vol. 20, no. 3, p. 5–22, DOI: 10.29141/2658-2019-20-3-1. (In Russian)

2. Baier S.L., Dwyer G.P., Tamura R. How Important Are Capital and Total Factor Productivity for Economic Growth? Economic Inquiry, 2006, vol. 44, no. 1, p. 23–49.

3. Barro R.J., Lee J.W. A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010, Journal of Development Economics, 2013, vol. 104, p. 184–198.

4. Caselli F. Chapter 9 Accounting for Cross-Country Income Differences, Handbook of Economic Growth, Elsevier, 2005, vol. 1, p. 679–741.

5. Feenstra R.C., Heston A., Timmer M.P., Deng H. Estimating real production and expenditures across nations: A proposal for improving the penn world tables, Review of Economics and Statistics, 2009, vol. 91, no. 1, p. 201–212.

6. Feenstra R.C., Inklaar R., Timmer M.P. The Next Generation of the Penn World, Version 8.0, American Economic Review, 2015, vol. 105., no. 10, p. 3150–3182.

7. Freeman D., Freeman D., Inklaar R., Diewert W.E. Natural Resources and Missing Inputs in International Productivity Comparisons, Review of Income and Wealth, 2021, ser. 61, no. 1, p. 1–17, DOI: 10.1111/roiw.12451.

8. Hsieh C.-T., Klenow P.J. Development Accounting, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2010, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 207–223.

9. Measuring Productivity – OECD Manual: Measurement of Aggregate and Industry-level Productivity Growth, OECD, Paris, OECD Publishing, 2001, 156 p.

10. O’Donnell C.J. An aggregate quantity framework for measuring and decomposing productivity change, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2012, vol. 38, no. 3, p. 255–272.

11. O’Donnell C.J. Econometric estimation of distance functions and associated measures of productivity and efficiency change, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer US, 2014, vol. 41, no. 2, p. 187–200.

12. O’Donnell C.J. Productivity and Efficiency Analysis: An Economic Approach to Measuring and Explaining Managerial Performance, Singapore, Springer, 2018, 439 p.

13. System of National Accounts 2008, New York, United Nations, 2009, 709 p.

14. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2018: Building a Sustainable Future, G. Lange, Q. Wentin, K. Carey (еds.), Washington, DC, World Bank, 2018, 255 p.

15. Web sources Dakpo K.H., Desjeux Y., Latruffe L. Рroductivity: Indices of Productivity and Profitability Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), 2018, URL: https://cran.r-project.org/package=productivity/ (access date 10.08.2021).

16. PWT 10.0 / University of Groningen, 2021, URL: https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/productivity/pwt/ (access date10.08.2021).

17. Total natural resources rents (% of GDP), Data, The World Bank, URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.TOTL.RT.ZS (access date 10.08.2021).

18. World KLEMS Data, URL: http://www.worldklems.net/data.htm (access date 10.08.2021).


Review

For citations:


Rostislav K.V. Differences between the countries of the world in overall productivity. Lomonosov Geography Journal. 2022;(2):16-24. (In Russ.)

Views: 235


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0579-9414 (Print)