Preview

Lomonosov Geography Journal

Advanced search

Two-component separation of the Protva River hydrograph

Abstract

The 2009, 2010, 2011, 2019 and 2020 hydrographs for the Protva River were separated into fast and basic components by the grapho-analytical method using the GrWat software package. The algorithm makes it possible to automatically separate the spring flood, baseline runoff, rain and thaw floods, depending on the characteristics of the water regime and uses the meteorological information of re-analysis. Separation of the runoff into two genetic components – groundwater and precipitation for individual days of the summer low-water period was performed. Isotopic separation was performed by the balance equation according to the δ18О values determined in river runoff and groundwater outlets. The oxygen isotopic composition of precipitation was taken as a monthly average δ18О of Moscow. For the summer low water, the algorithm divides the runoff into fast (atmospheric precipitation, surface runoff) and basic. The basic runoff separated by the GrWat algorithm is the total underground supply and consists of the groundwater itself and the suspended water. The assessment of soil component by the isotopic method does not include the suspended water. Thus, by using both separation methods together, it is possible to estimate the proportion of suspended water in the base runoff. The aim of the study was to establish the feature of the base flow of the Protva River and determine the amounts of groundwater supply, precipitation and water entering the main channel through the soil horizons (suspended water) for the summer low-water period. It was found that the contribution of the ground water component to the base flow is about 70–80%, and 20–30% of the base flow is formed by precipitation coming through the soil horizons. The study of the base flow formation and its separation in the GrWat algorithm is currently important for the catchments with irregular observations. The importance increases under the sharp interannual changes in water regime resulting from climate changes.

About the Authors

Ju. N. Chizhova
Institute of Geology of Ore Deposits, mineralogy, petrography and geochemistry (IGEM) RAS, Laboratory of isotope geochemistry and geochronology, Senior Scientifi c Researcher
Russian Federation

Ph.D. in Geography



E. P. Rets
Institute of Water Problems RAS, Laboratory of Regional Hydrology
Russian Federation

Scientifi c Researcher, Ph.D. in Geography



N. A. Tebenkova
Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, Laboratory of Climate and Environment Changes
Russian Federation

Junior Scientifi c Researcher



A. V. Kozachek
Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, Laboratory of Climate and Environment Changes
Russian Federation

Junior Scientifi c Researcher



A. N. Veres
Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, Laboratory of Climate and Environment Changes
Russian Federation

Engineer



A. A. Ekaikin
Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, Laboratory of Climate and Environment Changes
Russian Federation

Leading Scientifi c Researcher, Ph.D. in Geography



A. V. Gorbarenko
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography, Department of Land Hydrology
Russian Federation

Student



N. A. Varentsova
FSBI “Central UGMS”, head of the Department of Hydrological Forecasts
Russian Federation

Engineer



M. B. Kireeva
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography, Department of Land Hydrology
Russian Federation

Associate Professor, Ph.D. in Geography



N. L. Frolova
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography, Department of Land Hydrology
Russian Federation

Professor



I. D. Eremina
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography, Department of Meteorology and Climatology, Meteorological Laboratory
Russian Federation

Leading Scientifi c Researcher, Ph.D. in Chemistry



A. G. Kositskiy
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography, Department of Land Hydrology
Russian Federation

Associate Professor, Ph.D. in Geography



References

1. Burns D.A. Stormflow-hydrograph separation based on isotopes: the thrill is gone – what’s next? Hydrological Processes, 2002, vol. 16, p. 1515–1517? DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5008.

2. Buttle J.M. Isotope hydrograph separations and rapid delivery of pre-event water from drainage basins, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 1994, vol. 18, p. 16–41.

3. Chizhova Yu.N., Budantseva N.A., Efimova L.E., Lukyanova A.N., Surkova G.V., Vasil’chuk Yu.K. Izotopnokislorodnyi sostav osadkov i vody v rechnoi sisteme srednei Protvy [Oxygen isotope composition of precipitation and water in the Middle Protva River system], Vestn. Mosk. un-ta, Ser. 5, Geogr., 2013, no. 2, p. 84–93. (In Russian)

4. Chizhova Yu.N., Eremina I.D., Budantseva N.A., Surkova G.V., Vasil’chuk Yu.K. Concentration of 18O in precipitation over Moscow in 2014, Russian Meteorology and Hydrology, 2017, no. 1, p. 54–63.

5. Dinçer T., Payne B.R., Florkowski T., Martinec J., Tongiorgi E. Snowmelt runoff from measurements of tritium and oxygen-18, Water Resources Research, 1970, vol. 6(1), p. 110–124, DOI: 10.1029/WR006i001p00110.

6. Dzhamalov R.G., Frolova N.L., Retz E.P., Bugrov A.A. Formation of Current Groundwater Resources in European Russia, Water resources, 2015, vol. 42, no. 5, p. 563–571.

7. Eckhardt K. How to Construct Recursive Digital Filters for Baseflow Separation, Hydrological Processes, 2005, vol. 19(2), p. 507–515.

8. Evstigneev V.M. Rechnoĭ stok i gidrologicheskiye raschety [River runoff and hydrological calculations], Moscow, Moscow St. Univ. Publ., 1990, 304 p. (In Russian)

9. Fischer B.M.C., Meerveld van H.J.I., Seibert J. Spatial variability in the isotopic composition of rainfall in a small headwater catchment and its effect on hydrograph separation, Journal of Hydrology, 2017, no. 547, p. 755–769.

10. Freeze R.A. Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff: 2. Upstream source areas, Water Resources Research, 1972, vol. 8(5), p. 1272–283, DOI: 10.1029/wr008i005p01272.

11. Fritz P., Cherry J., Weyer K., Sklash M. Storm runoff analyses using environmental isotopes and major ions, Interpretation of Environmental Isotope and Hydrochemical Data in Groundwater, Panel Proceedings Series-International Atomic Energy Agency. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, 1976, p. 111–130.

12. Goodrich D.C., Faurès J.-M., Woolhiser D.A., Lane L.J., Sorooshian S. Measurement and analysis of small-scale convective storm rainfall variability, Journal of Hydrology, 1995, vol. 173, p. 283–308, DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(95)02703-R.

13. Gubareva T.S., Gartsman B.I., Shamov V.V., Lutsenko T.N., Boldeskul A.G., Kozhevnikova N.K., Lupakov S.Yu. Komponenty stoka malykh vodosborov Sikhote-Alinya: obobshcheniye rezul’tatov polevykh izmereniy i trassernogo modelirovaniya [Runoff components of small catchments in Sikhote-Alin: summarizing the results of field measurements and tracer modeling], Izvestiya Rossiyskoj akademii nauk, Geogr. seriya, 2019, no. 6, p. 126–140. (In Russian)

14. Hall F.R. Base flow recessions – a review, Water Resources Research, 1968, vol. 4(5), p. 973–983.

15. Herrmann A., Stichler W. Groundwater-runoff relationships, Catena, 1980, no. 7, p. 251–263.

16. Hubert P., Marin E., Meybeck M., Olive E.S. Aspects Hydrologique, Geochimique et Sedimentologique de la Crue Exceptionnelle de la Dranse du Chablais du 22 Septembre 1968, Arch. Sci (Geneve), 1969, no. 3, p. 581–604.

17. Katsuyama M., Yoshioka T., Konohira E. Spatial distribution of oxygen-18 and deuterium in stream waters across the Japanese archipelago, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2015, vol. 19, p. 1577–1588, DOI: 10.5194/hess-19-1577-2015.

18. Kireeva M.B., Rets E.P., Frolova N.L., Samsonov T.E., Povalish nikova E.S., Entin A.L., Durmanov I.N., Ivanov A.M. Occasional floods on the rivers of the Russian Plain in the 20th –21st centuries, Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 2020, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 84–95.

19. Klaus J., McDonnell J.J. Hydrograph separation using stable isotopes: Review and evaluation, Journal of Hydrology, 2013, vol. 505, p. 47–64, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.006.

20. Klaus J., Zehe E., Elsner M., Külls C., McDonnell J.J. Macropore flow of old water revisited: experimental insights from a tile-drained hillslope, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2013, vol. 17, p. 103–118, DOI: 10.5194/hess17-103-2013.

21. Kudelin B.I. Printsipy regional’noi otsenki estestvennykh resursov podzemnykh vod [Principles for Regional Assessment of Natural Groundwater Resources], Moscow, Moscow St. Univ. Publ., 1960, 343 p. (In Russian)

22. Ladson A.R., Brown R., Neal B., Nathan R. A Standard Approach to Baseflow Separation Using the Lyne and Hollick Filter, Australian Journal of Water Resources, 2013, DOI: 10.7158/W12-028.2013.17.1.

23. Laudon H., Hemond H.F., Krouse R., Bishop K.H. Oxygen 18 fractionation during snowmelt: Implications for spring flood hydrograph separation, Water Resources Research, 2002, vol. 38, p. 40-1–40-10, DOI: 10.1029/2002WR001510.

24. Lichkov B.L. Prirodnye vody zemli i litosfery [Natural waters of the earth and lithosphere], Leningrad, Russian Academy of Science, 1960, 164 p. (in Russian)

25. McDonnell J.J., Beven K. Debates – The future of hydrological sciences: A (common) path forward? A call to action aimed at understanding velocities, celerities and residence time distributions of the headwater hydrograph, Water Resources Research, 2014, vol. 50, p. 5342–5350, DOI: 10.1002/2013WR015141.

26. Nathan R.J., McMahon T.A. Evaluation of Automated Techniques for Baseflow and Recession Analysis, Water Resources Research, 1990, vol. 26(7), p. 1465–1473.

27. Nauchno-prikladnoi spravochnik: Osnovnye gidrologicheskie kharakteristiki rek basseina Verkhnei Volgi [Scientific and applied reference book: Basic hydrological characteristics of rivers in the Upper Volga basin], Georgievsky V.Yu. (ed.), Livny, Publisher Mukhametov G.V., 2015, 467 p. (In Russian)

28. Popov O.V. Podzemnoe pitanie rek [Underground feeding of rivers], Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat Publ., 1968, 290 p. (In Russian)

29. Rukovodstvo po gidrologicheskim prognozam, vyp. 1, Dolgosrochnye prognozy elementov vodnogo rezhima rek i vodokhranilishch [Guide to Hydrological Forecasts, iss. 1, Long-term forecasts of the elements of the water regime of rivers and reservoirs], Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat Publ., 1989, 358 p. (In Russian)

30. Schürch M., Kozel R., Schotterer U., Tripet J.P. Observation of isotopes in the water cycle-the Swiss National Network (NISOT), Environ. Geol., 2003, vol. 45, p. 1–11, DOI: 10.1007/s00254-003-0843-9.

31. Seeger S., Weiler M. Reevaluation of transit time distributions, mean transit times and their relation to catchment topography, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2014, vol. 18, p. 4751–4771, DOI: 10.5194/hess-18-4751-2014.

32. Segura C., Noone D., Warren D., Jones J., Tenny J., Ganio L. Climate, landforms, and geology affect baseflow sources in a mountain catchment, Water Resources Research, 2019, vol. 55, DOI: 10.1029/2018WR023551.

33. Vladimirov A.M. Stok rek v malovodnyi period goda [River runoff during low-water season], Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat Publ., 1976, 265 p. (In Russian)

34. Voronkov P.P. Gidrokhimicheskie obosnovaniya vydeleniya mestnogo stoka i sposob raschleneniya ego gidrografa [Hydrochemical substantiation of the local runoff separation and the method of hydrograph separation], Meteorologiya i gidrologiya, 1986, no. 8, p. 21–28. (In Russian)

35. IAEA/WMO, Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation, GNIP Database, 2020, URL: https://nucleus.iaea.org/wiser (date access 01.10.2020).


Review

For citations:


Chizhova J.N., Rets E.P., Tebenkova N.A., Kozachek A.V., Veres A.N., Ekaikin A.A., Gorbarenko A.V., Varentsova N.A., Kireeva M.B., Frolova N.L., Eremina I.D., Kositskiy A.G. Two-component separation of the Protva River hydrograph. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5, Geografiya. 2021;(6):62-76. (In Russ.)

Views: 566


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0579-9414 (Print)