Spatial organization of the higher education of Russia
Abstract
The traditional and new approaches to the geographical study of higher education are discussed. Along with quantitative indicators, it is proposed to use qualitative indicators more widely in assessing the spatial differentiation of higher education, and the impact of the territorial organization of the higher education system on regional development.
It is indicated that the educational space of a country or a region could be considered both a static and a dynamic system. In the first case, inequality reflects the situation at a specific time. The dynamic approach is aimed not so much at identifying the supporting frame of the educational space and the role of individual centers, but at the processes taking place there. To, it is however necessary to combine both approaches to analyze a regional situation and identify the trends of changes.
The authors consider it both possible and necessary to use ratings and rankings to identify spatial differences, whereas the quantitative indicators do not allow for adequate assessment of the role of a university in regional development.
Spatial disproportions in the distribution of “high-status” universities and world-class universities were revealed, as well as the differences of university potential in the cities of Russia. It is noted that the actual spatial organization of high schools supports the growing polarization of the innovation space in Russia. Russia is characterized by inequality in both the development of the network of research universities, and the spatial organization of universities of high reputation. The need to form a supporting framework for the country's educational space is indicated. It is noted that the cartographic method could become an effective tool for understanding spatial differentiation and spatial imbalances.
The conclusion is that the spatial organization of personnel training in modern Russia does not fully correspond to the spatial organization of their consumption, and does not take into account the profound structural changes that have occurred in the regional economy. The modern territorial organization of higher education objectively increases inequality in the possibility of further development of the center and the periphery. Modernization and development of a competitive economy in the regions of Russia imply changes in both the content of education, and the regional policy in the field of higher education.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. P. KatrovskiyRussian Federation
Professor, Sc.D. in Geography, Natural-Geographical Faculty, Department of Geography.
T. V. Vatlina
Russian Federation
Associate Professor, Ph.D. in Geography, Natural-Geographical Faculty, Department of Geography.
References
1. Atkinson E. Neravenstvo: kak s nim byt'? [Inequality: How to Deal With It?], Moscow, Delo Publ., 2018. 536 p. (In Russian)
2. Baburin V.L., Zemtsov S.P. Innovatsionnyi potentsial regionov Rossii [Innovative potential of Russian regions], Moscow, University book, 2017, 358 p. (In Russian)
3. Bray M., Thomas R.M. Levels of Comparison in Educational Studies: Different Insights from Different Literatures and the Value of Multilevel Analyses, Harvard Educational Review, 1995, vol. 65, no. 3, p. 472-490.
4. Comparative Education Research: Approaches and Methods, Hong Kong, Springer, 2014, 453 p.
5. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and mode 2 to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy, 2000, no. 29, p. 421-443, DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4.
6. Geographies of Knowledge and Power, P. Meusburger, G. Derek, L. Suarsana (eds.), Knowledge and Space, vol. 7, Springer, Netherland, 2015, 347 p., DOI: 10.1007/97894-017-9960-7.
7. Geographies of the University, P. Meusburger, M. Heffernan, L. Suarsana (eds.), Knowledge and Space, vol. 12, Springer, Cham, 2018, 676 p., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-31975593-9.
8. Goddard J. The Civic University and the City, Geographies of the University, P. Meusburger, M. Heffernan, L. Suarsana (eds.), Knowledge and Space, vol. 12, Springer, Cham, 2018, p. 355-373, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-75593-9_11.
9. Karpov A.O. Sovremennyi universitet kak draiver ekonomicheskogo rosta: modeli i missii [Modern University as a Driver of Economic Growth: Models and Missions], Problems of Economics, 2017, no. 3, p. 58-76. (In Russian)
10. Katrovskii A.P. Territorial'naya organizatsiya vysshei shkoly Rossii [Territorial organization of higher education in Russia], Smolensk, Oikumena Publ., 2003, 200 p. (In Russian)
11. Klyachko T.A., Semionova E.A. Vklad obrazovaniya v sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe razvitie regionov Rossii [The contribution of education to the socio-economic development of Russian regions], Economy of the region, 2018, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 791-805. (In Russian)
12. Meizon M. Sravnenie territorial'nykh ob”ektov. Issledovanie po sravnitel'nomu obrazovaniyu: Podkhody i metody [Comparison of Territorial Objects. Research on Comparative Education: Approaches and Methods], Moscow, Higher School of Economics Publ., 2019, p. 109-152. (In Russian)
13. Meusburger P. Bildungsgeographie: Wissen und Ausbildung in der raumlichen Dimension, Heidelberg, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, 1998, p. 569.
14. Millot B. International rankings: Universities vs. higher education systems, International Journal of Educational Development, 2015, no. 40, p. 156-165.
15. Tikunov V.S. Klassifikatsii v geografii: renessans ili uvyadanie? (Opyt formalnyh klassifikatsij) [Classifications in geography: Renaissance or decay? (Attempt of formal classifications)], Moscow, Smolensk, SGU Publ., 1997, 367 p. (In Russian)
16. QS World University Rankings, URL: https://www.topuni-versities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2020 (access date 15.11.2020).
17. Regiony Rossii. Social'no-ekonomicheskie pokazateli [Regions of Russia. Socio-economic indicators], 2020, stat. sb., Moscow, Rosstat Publ., 2020, p. 379-381, 1056-1057, URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/210/document/13204 (access date 11.12.2020). (In Russian)
18. Rejting investicionnoj privlekatel'nosti regionov Rossii: rezul'taty i osnovnye vyvody [Rating of investment attractiveness of Russian regions: results and main conclusions], URL: https://raex-a.ru/files/REG_2019_Analytica_Block_Web.pdf (access date 10.12.2020). (In Russian)
19. Reyting luchshikh vuzov Rossii. RAEX-100 [Rating of the best universities in Russia. RAEX-100], URL: https://raex-rr.com/education/universities/rating_of_universities_of_russia (access date 25.11.2020). (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Katrovskiy A.P., Vatlina T.V. Spatial organization of the higher education of Russia. Lomonosov Geography Journal. 2021;(5):3-13. (In Russ.)