Preview

Lomonosov Geography Journal

Advanced search

New approaches to the typology of rural areas of Russia

Abstract

In many countries approaches to the assessment of the potential of development in rural areas have been changed, which was reflected in the state policy. This research field is extremely important for Russia, primarily because of the geographical contrasts of its vast territory. In 2019 the state program of integrated development of rural areas was first adopted in the country. An important tool to reveal disparities in rural development is the typology of rural areas. The paper focuses on the issues of typological studies of rural areas with regards to Russian specifics and presents the results of their typology at different scales. Different impact of the factors of spatial differentiation of rural development was described for two levels, i. e. between the subjects of the Russian Federation and municipalities of the Bryansk oblast. Different variables were analyzed at the macro level. Some of them characterize features of the "rurality" of regions. Spatial distribution of the types, determined with the cluster method, clearly demonstrates longitudinal and latitudinal zonation. The southern agrarian and the northern non-Chernozem regions belong to different types. High percentage of aged population is a specific demographic feature in most regions of European Russia. Other regions are specific in their involvement in migration flows and ethnic composition. Rural areas of the central European part are better provided with transport, social and communal infrastructure. However, rural areas equipped with running water, sanitation, and central heating systems account for just one-third of the territory even in the most successful regions. The availability of infrastructure is extremely poor on the periphery, and, especially, in the North. The natural increase of population and the migration balance were used as indicators for typology of rural areas of the Bryansk oblast on micro level. Four types of municipalities were identified, i. e. depressive periphery, sustainable developing and stable peri-urban, and agrarian leaders.

About the Authors

A. S. Naumov
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography; HSE University, Institute for Agrarian Studies
Russian Federation

Department of Social and Economic Geography of Foreign Countries, Head of Department, PhD in Geography; Department for Rural Development Studies, Head of Department



I. N. Rubanov
HSE University, Institute for Agrarian Studies
Russian Federation

Department for Rural Development Studies, Expert, PhD in Geography



N. H. Ablyazina
Autonomous state institution "Research and Design Institute of Moscow Urban Planning"
Russian Federation

Scientific-Methodical Division, Specialist



References

1. Alekseev A.I., Safronov S.G. Tipologiya sel‘skix naselenny‘x punktov evropejskoj chasti Rossii v sovremennoj demograficheskoj i social‘no-e‘konomicheskoj situacii [Typology of rural settlements in the European part of Russia under recent demographic and socioeconomic situation], Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 5. Geogr., 2017, no. 6, p. 55–61. (In Russian)

2. Alekseev A.I., Safronov S.G., Savoskul M.S., Kuznecova G.Yu. Osnovny‘e tendencii e‘volyucii sel‘skogo rasseleniya Rossii v XX – nachale XXI v. [The Main Trends in the Evolution of Rural Settlement in Russia in the 20th – early 21st Centuries], E‘KO, 2019, no. 4, p. 26–49. (In Russian)

3. Chislennost‘ naseleniya Bryanskoj oblasti po municipal‘ny‘m obrazovaniyam v razreze naselyonny‘x punktov na 1 yanvarya 2013 goda [Population numbers of municipalities of the Bryansk oblast showing individual settlements as on January 1, 2013], 2013, Stat. sb., Bryansk, Bryanskstat Publ., 2013, 90 p. (In Russian)

4. E‘fendiev A.G., Bolotina I.A. Sovremennoe rossijskoe selo: na perelome e‘pox i reform. Opy‘t institucional‘nogo analiza [Modern Russian village: at the edge of epochs and reforms. An attempt of the institutional analysis], Mir Rossii: Sociologiya, e‘tnologiya, 2002, no. 4, p. 83–125. (In Russian)

5. George P. La campagne. Le fait rural а travers le monde, Paris, 1956.

6. Glezer O.B., Borodina T.L., Artobolevskij S.S. Reforma mestnogo samoupravleniya i administrativno-territorial‘noe ustrojstvo sub“ektov RF [Local Self-Governmental Reform and Administrative Territorial System of the Subjects of the Russian Federation], Izvestiya RAN. Ser. geogr., 2008, no. 5, p. 51–64. (In Russian)

7. Kovalev S.A. Izbranny‘e trudy‘[Selected works], Smolensk, Ojkumena Publ., 2003, 438 p. (In Russian)

8. Kryuchkov V.G. Ispol‘zovanie zemel‘ i prodovol‘stvenny‘e resursy‘[Land use and food supplies], Moscow, Mysl‘ Publ., 1987, 232 p. (In Russian)

9. Li Y.H., Westlund H., Liu Y.S. Why some rural areas decline while some others not: An overview of rural evolution in the world, Journal of Rural Studies, 2019, vol. 68, p. 145–163.

10. Naumov A.S., Kuzina I.M., Rakitnikov A.N. [Typology of the world agriculture], Problemy‘ prirodnogo i sel‘skoxozyajstvennogo rajonirovaniya i tipologii sel‘skix mestnostej SSSR [Issues of natural and agricultural regionalization and typology of rural areas of the USSR], Materialy‘ IX Vsesoyuznoj mezhvuzovskoj konferencii, Moscow, Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1987, p. 197–202. (In Russian)

11. Nefedova T.G. Osnovny‘e tendencii izmeneniya social‘noe‘konomicheskogo prostranstva sel‘skoj Rossii [Major trends for changes in the socio-economic space of rural Russia], Izvestiya RAN. Ser. geogr., 2012, no. 3, p. 5–21. (In Russian)

12. Nefedova T.G. Sel‘skaya Rossiya na pereput‘e: geograficheskie ocherki [Rural Russia at the crossroads: geographical essays], Moscow, Novoe izd-vo Publ., 2003. (In Russian)

13. Nefedova T.G., Medvedev A.A. Szhatie osvoennogo prostranstva v central‘noj chasti Evropejskoj Rossii: dinamika naseleniya i ispol‘zovanie zemel‘ v sel‘skoj mestnosti [Shrinkage of active space in Central Russia: population dynamics and land use in countryside], Izvestiya RAN. Ser. geogr., 2020, vol. 84, no. 5, p. 645–659. (In Russian)

14. O sostoyanii sel‘skix territorij v Rossijskoj Federacii v 2018 g. [On the state of rural areas in the Russian Federation in 2018], Moscow, Minsel‘khoz Rossii Publ., 2020, 225 p. (In Russian)

15. O khode realizacii federal‘noj celevoj programmy‘ "Ustojchivoe razvitie sel‘skix territorij na 2014–2017 gody‘ i na period do 2020 goda" v 2014–2017 gg. [About the realization of the Federal Program on the "Sustainable development of rural area in 2014–2017 and till 2020" in 2014–2017], Moscow, Minsel‘khoz Rossii Publ., 2018, 124 p. (In Russian)

16. OECD Regional Outlook 2016: Productive Regions for Inclusive Societies, Paris, OECD Publishing, 2016, 306 p.

17. Prikaz ob utverzhdenii detal‘nogo plana-grafika realizacii "Gosudarstvennoj programmy‘ razvitiya sel‘skogo xozyajstva i regulirovaniya ry‘nkov sel‘skoxozyajstvennoj produkcii, sy‘r‘ya i prodovol‘stviya na 2013–2020 gody‘" na 2017 god i na planovy‘j period 2018 i 2019 godov [Order on approval of the execution plan for the "State program of agriculture development and regulation of agricultural markets in 2013–2020" into 2017 and further in 2018 and 2019], Moscow, Minsel‘khoz Rossii, 2017, 66 p. (In Russian)

18. Rakitnikov A.N. Izbranny‘e trudy‘ [Selected works], Smolensk, Ojkumena Publ., 2003, 471 p. (In Russian)

19. Regiony‘ Rossii. Social‘no-e‘konomicheskie pokazateli [Regions of Russia. Socio-economic indicators], 2018, Stat. sb., Moscow, Rosstat Publ., 2018, 1162 p. (In Russian)

20. Rubanov I.N., Tikunov V.S. Ustojchivoe razvitie regionov Rossii: integral‘naya ocenka [Sustainable development of the regions of Russia: integral assessment], Geogr. vestnik, 2009, vol. 3, no. 11, p. 69–76.

21. Torre A., Wallet F. Regional Development in Rural Areas. Analytical Tools and Public Policies, Springer, 2016, 110 p.

22. Yanbykh R., Saraikin V., Lerman Z. Changes in Russia’s agrarian structure: what can we learn from agricultural census? Russian Journal of Economics, 2020, no. 6(1), p. 26–41.

23. Zubarevich N.V. Transformation of the rural settlement pattern and social services network in rural areas, Regional Research of Russia, 2013, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 221–233.

24. Web sources Baza danny‘x pokazatelej municipal‘ny‘x obrazovanij, URL: gks.ru/storage/mediabank/munst.htm (access date 20.11.2019). (In Russian)

25. E‘lektronny‘j fond pravovoj i normativno-texnicheskoj dokumentacii: Ob utverzhdenii gosudarstvennoj programmy‘ Rossijskoj Federacii "Kompleksnoe razvitie sel‘skix territorij" i o vnesenii izmenenij v nekotory‘e akty‘ Pravitel‘stva Rossijskoj Federacii, URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/554801411 (access date 20.11.2019).

26. Eurostat: Geographical information system of the Commission (GISCO), URL: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php/Geographical_information_system_of_the_Commission_(GISCO) (access date 12.09.2019).

27. Federal‘naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoj statistiki: Chislennost‘ naseleniya Rossijskoj Federacii po municipal‘ny‘m obrazovaniyam (na 1 yanvarya 2019 g.), URL: http://old.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/afc8ea004d56a39ab251f2bafc3a6fce (access date 19.11.2019).

28. Federal‘naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoj statistiki: Regional‘naya statistika, URL: https://www.gks.ru/regional_statistics (access date 22.09.2019).

29. Federal‘naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoj statistiki: Statisticheskaya informaciya o social‘no-e‘konomicheskom razvitii sel‘skix territorij Rossijskoj Federacii, URL: gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/region_stat/sel-terr/sel-terr.html (access date 17.09.2019).

30. Lebedev V., Rubanov I. Kovboi v bryanskom lesu, URL: https://expert.ru/expert/2011/11/kovboi-v-bryanskom-lesu/ (access date 21.11.2019). (In Russian)

31. OECD: The New Rural Paradigm: Policies and Governance, URL: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/thenewruralparadigmpoliciesandgovernance.htm (access date 20.11.2019).

32. Pravitel‘stvo Bryanskoj oblasti: Novosti. Aleksandr Bogomaz i Viktor Linnik podpisali investicionny‘e soglasheniya mezhdu Bryanskoj oblast‘yu i OOO "Bryanskaya myasnaya kompaniya", URL: http://www.bryanskobl.ru/news/2019/02/14/9793 (access date 19.11.2019).

33. Publichnaya karta Rosreestra [E‘lektronny‘j resurs], URL: https://pkk5.rosreestr.ru (access date 17.09.2019).

34. Vserossijskaya perepis’ naseleniya 2010. Federal’naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoj statistiki, URL: https://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/perepis2010/croc/perepis_itogi1612.htm (access date 12.09.2019).

35. Vserossijskaya sel’skohozyajstvennaya perepis’ 2016 goda. Federal’naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoj statistiki, URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/519 (access date 22.09.2019).

36. United States Census Bureau: Geography Program. Interactive Maps, URL: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/data/interactive-maps.html (access date 15.09.2019).

37. United States Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service: Statistics by State, URL: https://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/ (access date 17.09.2019).

38. Vserossijskaya sel‘skoxozyajstvennaya perepis‘ 2016, URL: http://www.vshp2016.ru/resume/ (access date 22.09.2019).


Review

For citations:


Naumov A.S., Rubanov I.N., Ablyazina N.H. New approaches to the typology of rural areas of Russia. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5, Geografiya. 2021;(4):12-24. (In Russ.)

Views: 945


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0579-9414 (Print)