Preview

Lomonosov Geography Journal

Advanced search

Bio­geographic aspects of estimating the efficiency of arable lands protection with forest belts

Abstract

The article deals with the problem of evaluating the effectiveness of forest reclamation of arable land in the areas affected by wind and water erosion, which has recently become a little popular practice in Russia. The method of calculating the parameters of soil protection and environmental impact of the system of protected forest belts has been improved. A quantitative assessment of regional costs and environmental and economic effects depending on the level of protective forest cover of fields and other bioengineering features of forest reclamation models was obtained relative to the soil and climate conditions of the south of the European territory of Russia. Their structure, absolute and relative values are determined. The regularities of the zonal dynamics of the efficiency of capital investments in protective afforestation are described, as well as the influence of natural and forest-cultural factors. It is established that the cost of protective afforestation pays off in the first year of full operation of forest belt systems, i. e. after 7 to 10 years of their growing. About 40 to 80% of the total ecological and economic effect of forest belts falls upon their soil protection influence and more than 10 to 50% upon the forest resource value, environmental and recreational functions. The contribution of the agro­ameliorative effect of windbreak forest belts, i. e. increase in grain crop yield, does not exceed 1%, and flow-regulation effect is about 4 to 12%. Thus, the protective afforestation could be first of all regarded as an important measure for preserving land resources, improving the safety of agricultural production, and as a means of providing low-forested regions with forest resources, improving the quality of the environment and solving social problems.

About the Authors

A. S. Manaenkov
Federal Scientific Center of Agro­ecology, Complex Amelioration and Protective Afforestation, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Department of Forest Amelioration and Forestry Problems, Head of Department, D. Sc. in Agriculture



E. A. Korneeva
Federal Scientific Center of Agro­ecology, Complex Amelioration and Protective Afforestation, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Department of  Forest Amelioration and Forestry Problems, Senior Scientific Researcher, PhD in Agriculture



References

1. Barabanov A.T. Nauchnye osnovy protivoerozionnoi melioratsii [Scientific foundations of erosion control reclamation], Izvestiya Nizhnevolzhskogo agrouniversitetskogo kompleksa: nauka i professional’noe obrazovanie, 2018, no. 2(50), p. 23–29. (In Russian)

2. Bentrup G., Cernusca I., Gold М. Supporting U.S. agricultural landscapes under changing conditions with agroforestry: аn annotated bibliography, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Washington, D.C., 2018, р. 63.

3. Bobylev S.N. Ustojchivoe razvitie v interesah budushchih pokolenij: ekonomicheskie prioritety [Sustainable Development for Future Generations: Economic Priorities], Mir novoj ekonomiki, 2017, no. 3, p. 90–96. (In Russian)

4. Borelli А., Conigliaro M., Olivier A. Agroforestry for landscape restoration, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, 2017, р. 22.

5. Brandle J.R., Hodges L., Zhou X.H. Windbreaks in North American agricultural systems, Agroforestry Systems, 2004, vol. 61, no. 1–3, р. 65–78, DOI :10.1023/B:AGFO.0000028990.31801.62.

6. Burgess P.J., Graves A., Garcнa de Jalón S., Palma J.H.N. Modelling agroforestry systems, Agroforestry for Sustainable Agriculture, Mosquera-Losada M.R., Prabhu R. (eds.), Cambridge, Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, 2019, p. 209–238, DOI: 10.19103/AS.2018.0041.13.

7. Elevitch C.R., Mazaroli D.N., Ragone D. Agroforestry Standards for Regenerative Agriculture, Sustainability, 2018, no. 10, p. 33–37, DOI: 10.3390/su10093337.

8. Jose S. Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: An overview, Agroforestry Systems, 2009, vol. 76, no. 1, р. 1–10, DOI: 10.1007/s10457-009-9229-7.

9. Kasimov D.V., Kasimov V.D. Nekotorye podkhody k otsenke ekosistemnykh funktsii (uslug) lesnykh nasazhdenii v praktike prirodopol’zovaniya [Some approaches to the assessment of ecosystem functions (services) of forest plantations in the practice of nature management], Moscow, Mir Nauki Publ., 2015, 91 p. (In Russian)

10. Korneeva E.A. [Protective forest belts as a factor of economic growth of agricultural production efficiency], Agroekologiya, melioratsiya i zashchitnoe lesorazvedenie [Agroecology, land reclamation and protective afforestation], Volgograd, Federal Scientific Center of Agro-ecology, Complex Melioration and Protective Afforestation, Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2018, p. 96–99.

11. Kulik K.N., Barabanov A.T., Manaenkov A.S., Kulik A.K. Obosnovanie prognoza razvitiya zashchitnogo lesorazvedeniya v Volgogradskoi oblasti [Justification of the forecast of protective afforestation development in the Volgograd region], Problemy prognozirovaniya, 2017, no. 6(165), р. 93–100. (In Russian)

12. Manaenkov A.S., Korneeva E.A. Metodologicheskie aspekty ekonomicheskoi otsenki mnogofaktornogo vozdeistviya na agrolandshafty vetrolomnykh lesnykh polos [Methodological aspects of the economic assessment of the multifactor impact of wind-break forest belts on agrolandscapes], Izvestiya Nizhnevolzhskogo agrouniversitetskogo kompleksa: nauka i professional’noe obrazovani, 2012, no. 3(27), p. 27–30. (In Russian)

13. Medvedev N.V. Ekologo-ekonomicheskaya otsenka ushcherba sel’skomu khozyaistvu ot erozii pochv [Ecological and economic assessment of soil erosion damage to agriculture], Pochvovedenie, 1986, no. 2, p. 105–111. (In Russian)

14. Medvedeva O.E. Metody ekonomicheskoi otsenki bioraznoobraziya. Teoriya i praktika otsenochnykh rabot [Methods of economic assessment of biodiversity. Theory and practice of evaluations], Moscow, Dialog-Moscow St. Univ. Publ., 1998, 120 p. (In Russian)

15. Metodika sistemnykh issledovanij lesoagrarnykh landshaftov [Methods of systematic research of agrosylvian landscapes], Moscow, All-Union Academy of Agricultural Sciences Publ., 1985, 112 p. (In Russian)

16. Normativy formirovaniya optimal’nykh lesomeliorativnykh kompleksov na pakhotnykh zemlyakh s uchetom faktorov degradatsii agrolandshaftov v khozyaistvakh raznoi formy sobstvennosti [Standards for the organization of optimal forest reclamation complexes on arable lands with due account of the factors of agricultural landscapes degradation at the farms of different ownership], Moscow, Russian Agricultural Academy Publ., 2002, 56 p. (In Russian)

17. Pavlovskii E.S. Zashchitnye lesonasazhdeniya – sistemoobrazuyushchij element landshafta agroterritorii [Protective forest stands as a system-forming element of the agricultural landscape], Vestnik rossijskoj sel’skokhozyajstvennoj nauki, 2002, no. 3, p. 17–18. (In Russian)

18. Porter J., Costanza R., Sandhu Н., Sigsgaard L., Wratten S. The value of producing food, energy and ecosystem services within an agro-ecosystem, Ambio, 2009, vol. 38, no. 4, р. 186–193, DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447-38.4.186.

19. Quinkenstein A. Ecological benefits of the alley cropping agroforestry system in sensitive regions of Europe, Environmental Science and Policy, 2009, vol. 12, р. 1112–1121, DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.08.008.

20. Rozhkov V.A. Otsenka erozionnoi opasnosti pochv [Assessment of soil erodibility], Byulleten’ Pochvennogo instituta im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, 2007, no. 59, р. 77–91. (In Russian)

21. Smith Jo., Pearce В., Wolfe М. Reconciling productivity with protetion of the environment: Is temperate agroforestry the answer? Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 2012, vol. 28, no. 1, р. 80–92, DOI: 10.1017/S1742170511000585P.

22. Strategiya razvitiya zashchitnogo lesorazvedeniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii na period do 2020 goda [Strategy for the development of protective afforestation in the Russian Federation up to 2020], Volgograd, All-Russian Research Institute of Agroforestry Publ., 2008, 34 p. (In Russian)

23. Tribunskaya V.M. Ekonomicheskaya effektivnost’ zashhitnykh lesnykh nasazhdenij v sisteme okhrany pochv ot ehrozii [Economic efficiency of protective forest plantations in the system of soil erosion control], Moscow, Agropromizdat Publ., 1990, 176 p. (In Russian)

24. Tribunskaya V.M., Kuz’mina T.S. Normativy pribavok urozhaya vazhneishikh sel’skokhozyaistvennykh kul’tur ot meliorativnogo vliyaniya polezashchitnykh lesnykh polos [Standards for crop increase of the most important agricultural crops due to the ameliorative influence of protective forest belts], Moscow, MSKh SSSR Publ., 1984, 99 p. (In Russian)

25. Tribunskaya V.M., Shcherbakova L.B. Ekonomicheskaya effektivnost’ polezashchitnykh lesnykh polos [Economic efficiency of protective forest belts], Lesnoe khozyaistvo, 1978, no. 10, p. 7–10. (In Russian)

26. Vasil’ev Yu.I. Еffektivnost’ sistem lesnykh polos v bor’be s deflyatsiei pochv [The efficiency of the systems of forest belts for soil deflation control], Volgograd, All-Russian Research Institute of Agroforestry Publ., 2003, 176 p. (In Russian)

27. Vorob’ev S.A. Zemledelie [Agriculture], Moscow, Agropromizdat Publ., 1991, 490 p. (In Russian)

28. Zomer R.J., Coe R., Place F., van Noordwijk M., Xu J. Trees on farms: an update and reanalysis of agroforestry’s global extent and socio¬ecological characteristics. Working Paper 179. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Bogor, Indonesia, 2014, 33 p., DOI: 10.5716/WP14064.


Review

For citations:


Manaenkov A.S., Korneeva E.A. Bio­geographic aspects of estimating the efficiency of arable lands protection with forest belts. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5, Geografiya. 2021;(3):48-54. (In Russ.)

Views: 679


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0579-9414 (Print)