Preview

Lomonosov Geography Journal

Advanced search

Assessment of the contribution of environmental and social factors to liveability in Moscow

Abstract

Liveability of cities and urban space quality are receiving the increasing attention in contemporary world. Urban liveability is an objective condition and subjective perception of physical and mental health, safety and convenience of the current state of a city by its residents. AHP method, widely used for scientific investigations, was applied to assess the liveability of a study area including several Moscow districts, of New Moscow as well. The results of opinion polls and sociological surveys were used to improve pair-wise comparison method. Six groups of environmental and social factors were ranked on the basis of calculated weights. In general, social factors, accounting for 65,5% (transport accessibility 39,1% and accessibility of infrastructure facilities 26,4% of the total) are more essential than ecological ones which account for 34,5% (environmental contamination 8,9%, green areas accessibility and quality 11,5%, noise pollution 11,7%, adverse geomorphologic processes 2,4%). The results of the assessment may be used in urban planning. The spatial features of liveability were analyzed using GIS software. Liveability of every residential building within the area under study was evaluated basing on the factors’ weights. Assessment schemes of case study area were designed for each factor. New Moscow and Moscow within its old boundaries (before 01.07.2012) are considerably different: the newly-annexed territories are less comfortable because of poorer accessibility of transport and infrastructure facilities, higher noise pollution and environment contamination. It has been revealed, that multistoried buildings of Solntsevo and Novo-Peredelkino are the most liveable, while low buildings in the neighborhood of Vnukovo district and Vnukovo village are the least liveable.

About the Authors

V. A. Kryukov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Faculty of Geography, Department of Environmental Management, postgraduate student



E. I. Golubeva
Lomonosov Moscow State University; I. Kant Baltic Federal University
Russian Federation

Faculty of Geography, Department of Environmental Management, Professor, D.Sc. in Biology Lomonosov MSU; Professor, D.Sc. in Biology Kant BFU



References

1. Arbab P City Prosperity Initiative Index: Using AHP Method to Recalculate the Weights of Dimensions and Sub-Dimensions in Reference to Tehran Metropolis. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 2017, no. 6(4), p. 289-301. DOI: 10.14207/ejsd.2017.v6n4p289.

2. Bai L., Wang H., Huang N., Du Q., Huang Y. An Environmental Management Maturity Model of Construction Programs Using the AHP-Entropy Approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, vol. 15, p. 1317. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15071317.

3. Bolysov S.I., Kharchenko S.V Gorodskoj rel’ef kak factor komfortnosti prozhivanija naselenija [Urban topography as a factor of comfortable living of the population]. Vestn. Mosk. un-ta, Ser. 5, Geogr., 2016, no. 1, p. 21-28. (In Russian)

4. Glazychev V.L. Urbanistika [Urban studies], Chast’ 2. Moscow, Evropa Publ., 2008, 330 p. (In Russian)

5. Gurram M.K., Bulusu L.D., Kinthada N.R. Urban Environmental Quality Assessment at Ward Level Using AHP Based GIS Multi-Criteria Modeling - A Study on Hyderabad City, India. Asian Journal of Geoinformatics, 2015, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 16-29.

6. Il 'ina I.N. Kachestvo gorodskoj sredy kak faktor ustojchivogo razvitija municipal’nyh obrazovanij [Urban environment quality as a factor of sustainable development of municipalities]. Imushhestvennye otnoshenija v Rossijskoj Federacii, 2015, no. 5(164), p. 69-82. (In Russian)

7. Lobodanova D.L., Samson I., Kurle K. Komfortnost' sredy kak faktor innovacionnogo razvitija goroda [Urban environment liveability as an innovative development factor]. E.T. Gajdar Institute of Economic Politics, Moscow, Delo Publ., 2013, 180 p. (In Russian)

8. Malczewski J., Moreno-Sanchez R., Bojorquez-Tapia L.A., Ongay-Delhumeau E. Multicriteria Group Decision-making Model for Environmental Conflict Analysis in the Cape Region. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1997, no. 40(3), p. 349374. DOI: 10.1080/09640569712137.

9. Maslov N.V Gradostroitel'naja ekologija [Urban planning ecology], Moscow, Vysshaja shkola Publ., 2003, 285 p. (In Russian)

10. Paskhina M. V. Sovremennye podhody k ocenke komfortnosti gorodskih territorij [Modern approaches to estimate comfort of city territories]. Jaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik, vol. III, (Estestvennye nauki), 2011, no. 2, p. 148-153. (In Russian)

11. Popov A.A. Ocenka territorial'noj differenciacii kachestva gorodskoj sredy g. Moskvy [An assessment of the territorial differentiation of Moscow urban environment liveability]. Extended abstract of PhD Thesis in Geography, Moscow, 2008, 24 p. (In Russian)

12. Ramos-Quintana F., Tovar-Sanchez E., Saldarriaga-Norena H., Sotelo-Nava H., Sanchez-Hernandez J.P., Castrejyn-Godinez M.-L. A CBR-AHP Hybrid Method to Support the Decision-Making Process in the Selection of Environmental Management Actions, Sustainability, 2019, 11,5649. DOI: 10.20944/preprints201909.0195.v1.

13. Rejmers N.F. Prirodopol'zovanie. Slovar'-spravochnik [Environmental management. Reference dictionary]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1990, 639 p. (In Russian)

14. Rezaei A., Tahsili S. Urban Vulnerability Assessment Using AHP, Advances in Civil Engineering, 2018, vol. 2018, 20 p. DOI: 10.1155/2018/2018601.

15. Rezaian S., SeyedA.J. Environmental Risk Analysis by Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method (Case Study: Karoon 3 Dam of Iran), The 2d International Conference on Environmental Engineering and Applications IPCBEE, 2011, vol. 17, p. 159-164. DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2012.725159.

16. Saaty T.L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, Int. J. Services Sciences, 2008, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 83-98. DOI: 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590.

17. Saaty T.L. Fundamentals of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In: The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making. Managing Forest Ecosystems, vol. 3, Schmoldt D.L., Kangas J., Mendoza G.A., Pesonen M. (Eds.), Springer, Dordrecht, 2001. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-9799-9_2.

18. SP 42.13330.2011 Gradostroitel’stvo. Planirovka i zastrojka gorodskih i sel'skih poselenij [Code of practice 42.13330.2011. Urban planning. Planning and housing in urban and rural settlements], 2011. (In Russian)

19. Tetior A.N. Gorodskaja ekologija [Urban ecology]. Moscow, Akademija Publ., 2008, 336 p. (In Russian)

20. Xiong Y., Zeng G.-M., Chen G.-Q., Tang L., Wang K.-L., Huang D.-Y. Combining AHP with GIS in synthetic evaluation of eco-environment quality - A case study of Hunan Province, China. Ecological modelling, 2007, no. 209, p. 97-109. DOI: 10.1016/ j.ecolmodel.2007.06.007.

21. Alekseevskij M. Strana kompromissov: o kakom zhil’e mechtajut rossijane i chto oni v itoge pokupajut, zhurnal KB «Strelka», 2017 [The country of compromises: what housing are Russians dreaming of and what are they buying eventually, the journal of design office «Strelka», 2017], URL: https://strelkamag.com/ru/article/house (access date 11.06.2019) (In Russian)

22. Arcadis Sustainable Cities Index, Arcadis, 2018, URL: https://www.arcadis.com/en/global/our-perspectives/sustainable-cities-index-2018/citizencentric-cities/ (access date 20.12.2019).

23. Doklady o sostojanii okruzhajushhej sredy v gorode Moskve v 2010-2018 g. Departament prirodopol’zovanija i ohrany okruzhajushhej sredy goroda Moskvy [State of the Moscow Environment report, 2010-2018. The Department of environmental management and protection], URL: https://www.mos.ru/eco/documents/doklady/ (access date 14.06.2019). (In Russian)

24. Faktory vybora zhil’ja: prioritety smeshhajutsja [The factors in choosing real estate: priorities redirection], Nedvizhimost’&Ceny [Real estate&Prices], URL: https://dmrealty.ru/rubrics/zakon-i-finansy/faktory-vybora-zhilya-prioritety-smeshchayutsya/ (access date 11.06.2019). (In Russian)

25. General’nyj plan goroda Moskvy do 2035 goda. Institut Genplana Moskvy [General Plan of Moscow until 2020. General Plan Institute of Moscow], URL: https://genplanmos.ru/project/generalnyy_plan_moskvy_do_2035_goda/ (access date 16.06.2019) . (In Russian)

26. Greenpeace Global Mapping Hub, URL: http://arcgis.greenpeace.org/air/ (дата обращения 14.06.2019) (access date 14.06.2019).

27. Huenner M., Rozman C., Pahek K. A Case Study on the Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Assess Agri-Environmental Measures of the Rural Development Programme (RDP 2007-2013) in Slovenia. Applications and Theory of Analytic Hierarchy Process — Decision Makingfor Strategic Decisions, 2016, URL: https://www.intechopen.com/books/applications-and-theory-of-analytic-hierarchy-process-decision-making-for-strategic-decisions/a-case-study-on-the-application-of-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-ahp-to-assess-agri-environmental-m (access date 11.06.2019) . DOI: 10.5772/63924.

28. IAIS OGD: Integrirovannaja avtomatizirovannaja informacionnaja sistema obespechenija gradostroitel’noj dejatel’nosti goroda Moskvy [IAIS OGD: Integrated automated information system supporting the Moscow City urban planning processes], URL: https://isogd.mos.ru/isogd-portal/home (access date 14.06.2019). (In Russian)

29. Indeks kachestva gorodskoj sredy - instrument dlja ocenki kachestva material’noj gorodskoj sredy i uslovij ejo formirovanija [Urban environment liveability index - a tool to assess the urban environment quality and conditions of its formation], Nacional’nyj proekt «Zhil’e i gorodskaja sreda» [National Project «Housing and urban environment], URL: https://индекс-городов.рф (access date 20.12.2019) (In Russian)

30. Eksperty vyjasnili tri opredeljajushhih faktora pri vybore novostrojki [Experts have identified three crucial factors when acquiring new real estate], Novostnoj portal Rambler/ Finansy[Rambler/Finances News], 2017, URL: https://finance.rambler.ru/other/38106919-eksperty-vyyasnili-tri-opredelyayuschih-faktora-pri-pokupke-kvartiry/ (access date: 06.04.2020). (In Russian)

31. Mosgorstat. Territorial’nyj organ Federal’noj sluzhby gosudarstvennoj statistiki po gorodu Moskve [Mosgorstat. The territorial Moscow City unit of Federal State Statistic Service], URL: http://moscow.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_ts/moscow/ru/statistics/population/ (access date 11.06.2019). (In Russian)

32. Polnyj rejting gorodov Rossii po kachestvu zhizni v 2018 godu [Life quality rating of all Russian cities, 2018], Portal nedvizhimosti «Domofond» [Real estate portal «Domofond»], URL: https://www.domofond.ru/statya/polnyy_reyting_gorodov_rossii_po_kachestvu_zhizni_v_2018_godu/7679 (access date 11.06.2019) . (In Russian)

33. Portal otkrytyh dannyh Pravitel’stva Moskvy [Moscow City Government open-access data portal], URL: https://data.mos.ru/ (access date 14.06.2019). (In Russian)

34. Prostranstvo goroda dlja cheloveka: issledovanie urovnja i dinamiki gradostroitel’nogo razvitija krupnejshih megapolisov mira [Urban space for humans: an investigation of urban development level and dynamics in the largest world metropolises], PwC, URL: https://www.pwc.ru/ru/publications/city-space.html) (access date 11.06.2019) . (In Russian)

35. Quality of living city ranking, Mercer, 2019, URL: https://mobilityexchange.mercer.com/Insights/quality-of-living-rankings (access date 17.06.2019).

36. Rdionovskaja I.S., Dorozhkina E.A. Ekologija urbanizirovannyh territorij v aspekte «zeljonoj arhitektury» i blagoustrojstva [Urban areas ecology in terms of green architecture and land improvement]. Urbanistika, Moscow, 2017, no. 2, p. 1119, URL: http://www.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=22835 (access date 11.06.2019). (In Russian)

37. Stypka T., Flaga-Maryacczyk A., Schnotale J. Application of the AHP Method in Environmental Engineering: Three Case. Applications and Theory of Analytic Hierarchy Process — Decision Making for Strategic Decisions, 2016, URL: https://www.intechopen.com/books/applications-and-theory-of-analytic-hierarchy-process-decision-making-for-strategic-decisions/application-of-the-ahp-method-in-environmental-engineering-three-case-studies (access date 11.06.2019). DOI: 10.5772/63990.

38. The Global Liveability Index, The Economist, 2019, URL: https://www.eiu.com/topic/liveability (access date 11.06.2019).

39. Top-5 kriticheski vazhnyh kriteriev pri vybore novostrojki [Top-5 extremely important criteria when choosing new real estate], Nedvizhimost’ RIA Novosti [Real estate RLA News], URL: https://realty.ria.ru/20170719/408769596.html (access date: 11.06.2019). (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Kryukov V.A., Golubeva E.I. Assessment of the contribution of environmental and social factors to liveability in Moscow. Lomonosov Geography Journal. 2020;(4):32-41. (In Russ.)

Views: 808


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0579-9414 (Print)