Preview

Lomonosov Geography Journal

Advanced search

Regionalization of the Russian Arctic according to the types of anthropogenic development and associated relief transformation by applying the cluster analysis

Abstract

Information about the occurrence of different types of anthropogenic objects, such as settlements, transport infrastructure, mining areas, etc., in the Arctic zone of Russia was collected and systematized. Information about anthropogenic objects was taken from the Internet open sources: cartographic projects, databases, projects and schemes for further development of the subjects of the Russian Federation. It has been established that only a fifth of the Russian Arctic territory is under economic development, while the rest of its territory practically lacks the anthropogenic objects. The degree of economic development of the Arctic territories gradually decreases eastward. The Republic of Karelia is characterized by the highest level of economic development (only 13,1% of its area is currently unaffected by economic activities), while the least developed subjects are the Krasnoyarsk Krai (95,2%) and the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) (87,2%). Data on the presence, location, and types of anthropogenic objects underwent the k-means method of cluster analysis in order to identify characteristic combinations of objects corresponding to the different types of development. Six main types of development have been identified within the Arctic zone of Russia, each of them is characterized by the dominance of a certain type of anthropogenic objects (residential objects, roads of various categories, mining facilities, fossil fuel transportation objects, and logging infrastructure). A specific type of development, namely integrated development, was also identified, which is characterized by a combination of three to five types of objects within a limited area. Each type of development is characterized by a certain combination of trends and the degree of relief transformation. In particular, the greatest transformation of relief and geomorphologicl processes is typical of the opencast mining areas (525 quarries with a total area of 605 km2). A large variety of anthropogenic forms of different sizes are forming and the natural course of relief-forming processes (permafrost, fluvial, slope, etc.) is totally disrupted there for long. The least significant impact on relief development is that of some linear transport structures, in particular, unpaved roads and underground gas pipelines. Depending on the types of development, the subjects of the Russian Federation which are the part of the Arctic zone are characterized by various forms of the influence of economic activities on relief development. For regions with the leading role of transport infrastructure (e. g. the Arkhangelsk region, Karelia, the Republic of Sakha), a more significant indirect human influence on relief development is characteristic, in comparison with the direct one (the areas with negative consequences along the pathways of infrastructure objects exceed the area of anthropogenic forms themselves). On the contrary, the most pronounced transformation of relief in mining areas (e. g. the Murmansk region) is associated with direct impact, primarily, the large-scale creation of anthropogenic forms. In general, the economic activity in the Arctic zone of Russia is rather weak: the transformation of relief and natural geomorphologic processes affects a total area of about 667 thousand square km, which is about 18% of the total area of the Russian Arctic.

About the Authors

A. V. Bredikhin
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Head of the Department, Professor, D.Sc. in Geography

Faculty of Geography, Department of Geomorphology and aleogeography



E. A. Eremenko
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Associate Professor, PhD. in Geography

Faculty of Geography, Department of Geomorphology and aleogeography



S. V. Kharchenko
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Senior Scientific Researcher, PhD. in Geography

Faculty of Geography, Department of Geomorphology and aleogeography



Yu. R. Belyaev
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Associate Professor, PhD. in Geography

Faculty of Geography, Department of Geomorphology and aleogeography



F. A. Romanenko
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Leading Scientific Researcher, PhD. in Geography

Faculty of Geography, Department of Geomorphology and aleogeography



S. I. Bolysov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Professor, D.Sc. in Geography

Faculty of Geography, Department of Geomorphology and aleogeography



Yu. N. Fuzeina
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Associate Professor, PhD. in Geography

Faculty of Geography, Department of Geomorphology and aleogeography



References

1. Bol’shagin A.Yu., Vyalyshev A.I., Dobrov V.M., Dolgov A.A., Zinov’ev S.V., Oltyan I.YU., Gorbatskij V.V. Kompleksnyj monitoring – neot”emlemaya chast’ bezopasnosti Arkticheskoj zony Rossijskoj Federacii [Integrated monitoring as an integral part of the security in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation] // Arktika. Ekologiya i ekonomika. 2014. № 1. P. 48–37. (In Russian)

2. Chesnokova I.V. Antropogennyj morfogenez v zone razvitiya mnogoletnemerzlyh porod [Anthropogenic morphogenesis in the zone of permafrost development] // Antropogennaya geomorfologiya. M.; Kiev: Media-PRESS, 2013. P. 167–173. (In Russian)

3. Derkach A.A. Deformacii zashchitnyh inzhenernyh sooruzhenij na trassah magistral’nyh gazoprovodov kak rezul’tat vozdejstviya ekzogennyh processov v usloviyah Zapolyar’ya [Deformations of protective engineering structures on the routes of gas pipelines as a result of exposure to exogenous processes in polar regions] / Antropogennaya geomorfologiya: nauka i praktika: materialy XXXII Plenuma Geomorfologicheskoj komissii RAN (g. Belgorod, 25–29 sentyabrya 2012 g.). M.; Belgorod: ID «Belgorod», 2012. P. 34–39. (In Russian)

4. Dmitriev V.G. Poluempiricheskij metod ocenki ekologicheskogo riska shel’fovoj i pribrezhnoj arkticheskoj zony dlya klyuchevyh arkticheskih rajonov [A semi-empirical method for assessing the environmental risk of the shelf and coastal Arctic zones for key Arctic regions] // Problemy Arktiki i Antarktiki. 2013. № 4. P. 96103. (In Russian)

5. Ekologicheskij atlas Rossii [Ecological Atlas of Russia] / A.H. Adzhiev, S.A. Bartalyov, M. Yu. Bekkiev I dr. M.: Feoriya, 2017. 510 p. (In Russian)

6. El’chaninov E.A. Osnovnye napravleniya inzhenernyh reshenij dlya ohrany prirodnyh kompleksov pri promyshlennom osvoenii Severnyh territorij [The main directions of engineering solutions for the protection of natural complexes under the industrial development of Northern territories] // Gorn. inf.-anal. byul. Otd. vyp. 1. Trudy Mezhdunarod. nauch. simpoziuma «Nedelya gornyaka – 2014». 2014. P. 196–210. (In Russian)

7. GOST R 52398-2005. Klassifikaciya avtomobil’nyh dorog. Osnovnye parametry i trebovaniya [Classification of roads. Key parameters and requirements]. M.: Standartinform, 2006. (In Russian)

8. Grebenec V.I., Isakov V.A. Deformacii avtomobil’nyh i zheleznyh dorog na uchastke Noril’sk – Talnah i metody bor’by s nimi [Deformations of roads and railways within the Norilsk-Talnakh section and methods of their control] // Kriosfera Zemli. 2016. T. 20. № 2. P. 69–77. (In Russian)

9. Hlobystin L.P. Drevnyaya istoriya Tajmyrskogo Zapolyar’ya i voprosy formirovaniya kul’tur Severa Evrazii [The ancient history of the Taimyr Arctic and the issues of the formation of cultures of Northern Eurasia]. SPb.: Dmitrij Bulanin, 1998. 340 p. (In Russian)

10. Khalturin V.I., Rautian T.G., Richards P.G., Leith W.D. A review of nuclear testing by the Soviet Union at Novaya Zemlya, 1955–1990 // Science and Global Security. 2005. № 13. P. 1–42.

11. Kochurov B.I., Zotova L.I., Tumel’ N.V. Ekodiagnostika opasnyh geoekologicheskih situacij pri hozyajstvennom osvoenii kriolitozony [Ecodiagnostics of dangerous geoecological situations during the economic development of permafrost zone] // Problemy regional’noj ekologii. 2015. № 4. P. 157–164. (In Russian)

12. Kozhuhov I.V., Firsov Yu.G., Gordienko N.Yu. Severnyj region Rossijskoj Federacii kak zona ekologicheskogo riska i novyj tekhnologicheskij etap osvoeniya Arktiki [The northern region of the Russian Federation as a zone of environmental risk and a new technological stage in the development of the Arctic] // Ekspluat. mor. transp. 2013. № 2. P. 73–78. (In Russian)

13. Kozlova A.E. Antropogennoe preobrazovanie rel’efa v usloviyah hozyajstvennogo osvoeniya territorii poluostrova Yamal [Anthropogenic transformation of the relief under the economic development of the Yamal Peninsula] // Izv. RAN. Ser. geographicheskaya. 2013. № 4. P. 87–94. (In Russian)

14. Marahtanov V.P. Inzhenerno-geograficheskie issledovaniya na trassah magistral’nyh gazoprovodov v kriolitozone [Geographical engineering studies on the routes of gas pipelines in the permafrost zone] // Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 5. Geographia. 2011. № 4. P. 4247. (In Russian)

15. Pitul’ko V.V. Zhohovskaya stoyanka [Zhokhovskaya archaeological site]. SPb.: Dmitrij Bulanin, 1998. 189 p. (In Russian)

16. Pyle D. Data preparation for data mining. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993. 467 p.

17. Romanenko F.A. Geomorfologicheskie opasnosti na arkticheskih ostrovah i poberezh’yah [Geomorphologic hazards on Arctic islands and coasts] // Geomorfologiya i kartografiya: Materialy 33 Plenuma geomorfologicheskoj komissii RAN, Saratov, 17–11 sent., 2013. Saratov, 2013. P. 234–237. (In Russian)

18. Rousseeuw P.J. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis // Computational and Applied Mathematics. 1987. № 20. P. 53–65.

19. Saf’yanov G.A., Repkina T.Yu. Faktory dinamiki beregov Unskoj guby (Letnij bereg Belogo morya) [Factors of the dynamics of the Unska Bay coasts (the Summer coast of the White Sea)] // Sovremennye global’nye izmeneniya prirodnoj sredy. T. 4. Faktory global’nyh izmenenij. M., 2012. P. 392–400. (In Russian)

20. Shiklomanov N.I., Streletskiy D.A., Grebenets V.I., Luis S. Conquering the permafrost: urban infrastructure development in Norilsk, Russia // Polar Geography. 2017. 40 (4). P. 273–290.

21. Shpolyanskaya N.A., Zotova L.I. Ekologicheskaya bezopasnost’ Rossijskogo Severa [Environmental safety of the Russian North] // Ekologiya i promyshlennost’. 1999. № 9. P. 12–18. (In Russian)

22. Thorndike R.L. Who Belongs in the Family? // Psychometrika. 1953. № 18(4). P. 267–276.

23. Tumel’ N.V., Zotova L.I., Streleckaya I.D. Opasnye kriogennye processy po trasse gazoprovoda Yamal-Vorkuta: geoekologicheskaya ocenka, monitoring [Dangerous cryogenic processes along the route of the Yamal-Vorkuta gas pipeline: geoecological assessment and monitoring] // Narodnoe hozyajstvo Respubliki Komi. 2005. T. 14. № 3. P. 278–283. (In Russian)

24. Voskresenskij K.S. Sovremennye rel’efoobrazuyushchie processy na ravninah Severa Rossii [Modern relief-forming processes on the plains of the North of Russia]. M.: Geogr. f-t MGU, 2001. 262 p. (In Russian)

25. Ward J.H. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function // Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1963. № 58:301. P. 236–244.

26. Wu J. Advances in k-means clustering: a data mining thinking. Springer, 2012. 180 p.

27. Zotova L.I., Koroleva N.A., Dedyusova S.Yu. Ocenka i kartografirovanie krizisnyh ekologicheskih situacij na territoriyah gazopromyslovogo osvoeniya v kriolitozone [Assessment and mapping of critical environmental situations within the territories of gas field development in the permafrost zone] // Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 5. Geographia. 2007. № 3. P. 54–59. (In Russian)

28. Zotova L.I., Tumel’ N.V. Metodologiya vybora prirodoohrannyh meropriyatij v oblasti vechnoj merzloty na primere Zapadno-Sibirskoj neftegazonosnoj provincii [The methodology of the selection of environmental measures in the permafrost area: case study of the West Siberian oil and gas province] // Problemy regional’noj ekologii. 2018. № 1. P. 93–98. (In Russian)

29. Arhitektura i gradostroitel’stvo. Ministerstvo stroitel’stva i territorial’nogo razvitiya Murmanskoj oblasti [Architecture and urban planning. Ministry of Construction and Territorial Development of the Murmansk Region] [Elektronnyj resurs]: URL: https://minstroy.gov-murman.ru/activities/arhitektura/ (access date 06.03.2019). (In Russian)

30. Geofabrik Download Server [Elektronnyj resurs]: URL: http://download.geofabrik.de/ (access date 02.03.2019).

31. Google Earth [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.google.com/intl/ru/earth/ (access date 15.03.2019).

32. Gosudarstvennyj kadastr mestorozhdenij i proyavlenij poleznyh iskopaemyh – Rossijskij Federal’nyj Geologicheskij Fond [The State Cadastre of Deposits and Mineral Occurrences – Russian Federal Geological Fund] [Elektronnyj resurs]: URL: https://www.rfgf.ru/gkm/ (access date 05.03.2019). (In Russian)

33. Highway Functional Classification Concepts, Criteria and Procedures [Elektronnyj resurs]: URL: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/processes/statewide/related/highway_functional_classifications/ (access date 06.03.2019).

34. Homepage. Copernicus [Elektronnyj resurs]: URL: https://www.copernicus.eu/en (access date 14.03.2019).

35. Landsat Science [Elektronnyj resurs]: URL: https://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/ (access date 13.03.2019).

36. OpenStreetMap Rossiya – Karta Online [Russia – Map Online] [Elektronnyj resurs]: URL: http://openstreetmap.ru/#map=3/62/88 (access date 01.03.2019).

37. Perechen’ rechnyh portov [The list of river ports] [Elektronnyj resurs]: URL: http://www.morflot.ru/deyatelnost/napravleniya_deyatelnosti/portyi_rf/perechen_rechnyih_portop.html (access date 04.03.2019). (In Russian)

38. Proekt skhemy territorial’nogo planirovaniya Neneckogo avtonomnogo okruga (izmeneniya 2017 goda) [Draft territorial planning scheme of the Nenets Autonomous Okrug (2017 changes)] [Elektronnyj resurs]: URL: http://gkh.adm-nao.ru/arhitektura-igradostroitelstvo/strategicheskoe-planirovanie/proekt-shemyterritorialnogo-planirovaniya-neneckogo-avtonomnogo-okrug/ (access date 09.03.2019). (In Russian)

39. Proekt Skhemy territorial’nogo planirovaniya RS(YA) [Draft Territorial Planning Scheme for the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)] [Elektronnyj resurs]: URL: https://minstroy.sakha.gov.ru/proektshemi-territorialynogo-planirovaniya-rs (access date 12.03.2019). (In Russian)

40. Reestr morskih portov [Register of seaports] [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.morflot.ru/deyatelnost/napravleniya_deyatelnosti/portyi_rf/reestr_mp.html (access date 03.03.2019). (In Russian)

41. Skhema territorial’nogo planirovaniya Arhangel’skoj oblasti [Territorial planning scheme of the Arkhangelsk region] [Elektronnyj resurs]: URL: https://old.dvinaland.ru/region/map/ (access date 08.03.2019). (In Russian)

42. Skhema territorial’nogo planirovaniya Yamalo-Neneckogo avtonomnogo okruga [Territorial planning scheme of the YamalNenets Autonomous Okrug] [Elektronnyj resurs]: URL: https://www.yanao.ru/activity/1530/ (access date 10.03.2019). (In Russian)

43. Skhema territorial’nogo planirovaniya. Pravitel’stvo Respubliki Kareliya [The scheme of territorial planning. Government of the Republic of Karelia] [Elektronnyj resurs]: URL: http://old.gov.karelia.ru/Power/Committee/Build/Plan/index.html (access date 07.03.2019). (In Russian)

44. Skhemy territorial’nogo planirovaniya Krasnoyarskogo kraya [Territorial planning schemes of the Krasnoyarsk krai] [Elektronnyj resurs]: URL: http://minstroy.krskstate.ru/graddoc/terrplan/0/id/25663 (access date 11.03.2019). (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Bredikhin A.V., Eremenko E.A., Kharchenko S.V., Belyaev Yu.R., Romanenko F.A., Bolysov S.I., Fuzeina Yu.N. Regionalization of the Russian Arctic according to the types of anthropogenic development and associated relief transformation by applying the cluster analysis. Lomonosov Geography Journal. 2020;(1):42-56. (In Russ.)

Views: 1163


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0579-9414 (Print)