Geoecological aspects of disturbed lands reclamation in the Karaganda region (the Republic of Kazakhstan)
Abstract
The Shubarkol coal deposit in the Karaganda region (the Republic of Kazakhstan) was an area to study geoecological conditions and predicted disturbances of a territory designed for reclamation. Various options for the reclamation of the territory disturbed by the open-pit coal mining are analyzed. Basing on the integrated analysis of natural conditions the optimal reclamation method was chosen that provides both the reduction of environmental tensions and the maximum restoration of the ecosystem biosphere functions, and also the improvement of socio-economic situation in the area.
Keywords
coal deposit,
quarry,
dump,
technical and biological reclamation,
steppe landscapes,
geoecological factors,
aesthetic and biospheric functions of landscape
Supporting agencies: The publication was prepared under the Russian Academic Excellence Project at the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University and partly under the scientific theme № АААА-А16-116032810096-3 at the Lomonosov Moscow State University.
About the Authors
Ye. A. Tseshkovskaya
Karaganda State Technical University;
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Mining Faculty, Department of Mine Aerology and Labor Protection, Senior Lecturer;
Faculty of Geography, Department of Environmental Management, postgraduate student
E. I. Golubeva
Lomonosov Moscow State University;
Baltic Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Faculty of Geography, Department of Environmental Management, Professor, Doctor of Biological Sciences;
D.Sc. in Biology, Professor
N. K. Tsoy
Karaganda State Technical University
Kazakhstan
Mining Faculty, Department of Mine Aerology and Labor Protection, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Senior Lecturer
Kazakhstan
Mining Faculty, Department of Mine Aerology and Labor Protection, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Senior Lecturer
A. T. Oralova
Karaganda State Technical University
Kazakhstan
Faculty of Innovative Technologies, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Candidate of Chemistry Sciences, Associate Professor
Kazakhstan
Faculty of Innovative Technologies, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Candidate of Chemistry Sciences, Associate Professor
V. V. Matonin
Karaganda State Technical University
Kazakhstan
Mining Faculty, Department of Mine Aerology and Labor Protection, graduate student
Kazakhstan
Mining Faculty, Department of Mine Aerology and Labor Protection, graduate student
References
1. Avessalomova I.A., D’yakonov K.N., Savenko A.V., Haritonova T.I. Geohimicheskaya transformaciya postmeliorirovannyh landshaftov [Geochemical transformation of post-ameliorative landscapes] // Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 5. Geogr. 2014. № 2. P. 17–24. (In Russian)
2. Anyanova E.V., Krajnova T.S., Voronov M.P. Problema rekul’tivacii zemel’, narushennyh v processe ugledobychi [Problem of land recultivation disturbed during coal mining] // Nauchnoe obozrenie. Biologicheskie nauki. 2016. № 3. P. 36–46. (In Russian)
3. Bancheva A.I., Alekseeva N.N. Geoekologicheskaya ocenka o. Hokkajdo [Geoecological assessment of Hokkaido Island] // Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 5. Geogr. 2017. № 3. P. 34–41. (In Russian)
4. Bragina P.S. Samovozgoranie ugol’nyh otvalov v Kemerovskoj oblasti [Spontaneous combustion of coal dumps in the Kemerovo Region] // Vestnik Kuzbasskoj gos. ped. akad. Novokuzneck, 2013. № 4(29). P. 57–64. (In Russian)
5. Bryzhko V.G. Vosstanovlenie narushennyh zemel’ v usloviyah krupnogo goroda [Reclamation of disturbed land in a large city] // Fundamental’nye issledovaniya. 2016. № 6–1. P. 134–138. (In Russian)
6. Budina T.Yu. Rekul’tivaciya zemel’ pri razlichnyh vidah rabot [Land reclamation in various types of work] // Spravochnik ekologa. 2013. № 3. P. 35–38. (In Russian)
7. Vasyuchkov Yu.F. Biotekhnologiya gornyh rabot [Mining biotechnology]. M.: Gornaya kniga, 2011. 351 p. (In Russian)
8. Galanina T.V., Lyubimova K.V. Problemy rekul’tivacii i vosstanovleniya narushennyh zemel’ pri otkrytoj razrabotke mestorozhdenij [Problems of recultivation and restoration of disturbed lands during open field mining] // Gornyj informacionnoanaliticheskij byulleten’. 2010. № 8. P. 256–259. (In Russian)
9. Kodeks Respubliki Kazahstan O nedrah i nedropol’zovanii ot 27 dekabrya 2017 goda № 125-VI ZRK [Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan On Subsoil and Subsoil Use]. 2017. (In Russian)
10. Metodika rascheta sbrosa livnevyh stokov s territorij naselennyh punktov i predpriyatij [The method of calculating the discharge of stormwater runoff from the territories of settlements and enterprises] (utverzhdena prikazom Ministra ohrany okruzhayushchej sredy RK № 203 – p ot 05.08.2011 g.). 2011. (In Russian)
11. SN RK 4.01-03-2011. Vodootvedenie. Naruzhnye seti i sooruzheniya [Drainage. External networks and facilities] (utverzhden i vveden v dejstvie Prikazom Predsedatelya Agentstva Respubliki Kazahstan po delam stroitel’stva i zhilishchnokommunal’nogo hozyajstva ot 29 dekabrya 2011 goda № 539). 2011. (In Russian)
12. Chizhova V.P., Shlyakova E.S. Rekreacionnyj potencial landshaftov Altachejskogo zakaznika [Recreational potential of landscapes of the Altachejskij partial reserve] // Vestnik Mosk. unta. Ser. 5. Geogr. 2017. № 5. P. 90–98. (In Russian)
13. Kirchhoff T., Trepl L, Vicenzotti V. What is landscape ecology? An analysis and evaluation of six different conceptions // Landscape Research. 2012. Vol. 38, R. 33–51.
14. Makhzoumi J., Pungetti G. Ecological landscape design and planning: the Mediterranean context. London: Spon-Routledge, 1999. 330 p.
15. Olwig K.R. Representation and alienation in the political landscape // Cultural Geographies. 2005. P. 19–40. DOI: 10.1191/1474474005eu321oa
16. Rebecca G., Varsha J., Aishwarya S., Priya A.J. Treatment methods for contaminated soils – translating science into practice // International J. of Education and Applied Research. 2014. V. 4. Iss. 1. P. 17–19.
17. Sanderson J., Harris L.D. Landscape ecology: a top-down approach. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: Lewis Publishers, 2000. 1082 p.
18. Troll C. The geographic landscape and its investigation / Foundation papers in landscape ecology (Ed. J.A. Wiens, M.R. Moss, M.G. Turner, and D.J. Mladenoff) New York: Columbia University Press, 2006. P. 71–101.
19. Wu J. Landscape ecology, cross-disciplinarity, and sustainability science // Landscape Ecology. 2006. Vol. 21, Iss. 1. P. 1–4. DOI 10.1007/s10980-006-7195-2.
20. Yijie L., Xiaoxia P. Ecotope-based urban post-industrial landscape design / IERI Procedia 9. 2014. P. 185–186. Web sources: Akimat Karagandinskoj oblasti. Prirodno-klimaticheskie usloviya [Akimat of Karaganda region. Natural and climatic conditions] [Elektronnyj resurs]: URL: https://karagandaregion.gov.kz/ru/region_1_3 (access date 06.08.2018).
21. Informacionnyj portal akimata Nurinskogo rajona [Information portal of the akimat of Nurinsky district] [Elektronnyj resurs]: URL: http://nurinsk.gov.kz/ru/news/id/1198 (access date 06.08.2018).
22. Ministerstvo po investiciyam i razvitiyu respubliki Kazahstan. Komitet geologii i nedropol’zovaniya [Ministry of Investment and Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Committee of Geology and Subsoil Use] [Elektronnyj resurs]: URL: http://www.info.geology.gov.kz/ru/informatsiya/spravochnik...kazakhstana/tverdye.../ (access date 06.08.2018).
23. The post-mining landscape. Recultivation in the Rhineland [Elektronnyj resurs]: URL: http://www.rwe.com/web/cms/mediablob/en/352232/data/0/2/dl-en-recultivation.pdf (access date 06.08.2018).
Review
For citations:
Tseshkovskaya Ye.A., Golubeva E.I., Tsoy N.K., Oralova A.T., Matonin V.V. Geoecological aspects of disturbed lands reclamation in the Karaganda region (the Republic of Kazakhstan). Lomonosov Geography Journal. 2019;(4):73-80. (In Russ.)
Views:
1165
Email this article 
