Preview

Lomonosov Geography Journal

Advanced search

Incomes of residents in west European capitals and the immigrants’ settlement pattern

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0579-9414.5.80.1.9

Abstract

   The article studies the relationship between the immigrants’ settlement and the incomes in large European capitals using the examples of London, Madrid and Berlin. Cities were selected based on the importance of the immigration processes, the availability of regional statistical materials and their role in the countries. These cities have attracted large numbers of immigrants, especially in the last 30 years (and earlier in the case of London due to the influx of people from former colonies). The example of housing costs and income distribution shows the socio-ethnic stratification. As a result of the study, cities’ districts were classified based on the immigrants’ percentage, income levels and housing prices, which demonstrated a high degree of territorial mosaic and heterogeneity. For four European capitals, it was shown that a hypothesis of close relationship between the income and migrants microgeography is not always confirmed. The most complicated picture is in London. In Berlin and Madrid, migrant localization sectors are visible, but (not to mention Moscow) it is more difficult to identify their connection with income stratification. A most notable characteristic of the cities studied is the growing immigrants’ numbers and their share in total population, which can reach up to 15–25 %. This fact in itself becomes a significant element of social differentiation. At the same time, immigration in each city has its own characteristics and diversity. Differences between immigrant groups largely determine a degree to which they are isolated or integrated into the city’s social space. London attracts everyone, both rich and poor. Traces of the city’s former partition are still visible in Berlin. In Madrid, there is a concentration of Latin Americans who are culturally similar. And in Moscow, the influx of immigrants often provokes an increase in the cultural distance between them and the locals. A large number and proportion of immigrants, their poor integration into the host society, and inter-ethnic conflicts result in lower tolerance and increasing social and ethnic contrasts.

About the Author

D. P. Shatilo
Center for Interdisciplinary Research
Russian Federation

Senior Scientific Researcher, Ph.D. in Geography

Moscow



References

1. Alexander M. Cities and labour immigration: Comparing policy responses in Amsterdam, Paris, Rome and Tel Aviv, Aldershot, Ashgate, 2007, 256 p.

2. Alov I.N. Evolyutsiya kontseptsiy prostranstvennoy segregatsii v gorodakh SSHA [Evolution of concepts of spatial segregation in US cities], Regional studies, Smol. humanitarian University, 2021, no. 1, p. 107–117, DOI: 10.5922/1994-5280-2021-1-9. (In Russian)

3. Bailey N., Gent van W., Musterd S. Remaking Urban Segregation: Processes of Income. Sorting and Neighbourhood Change, Population Space and Place, 2017, vol. 23(3), p. 1–16.

4. Barómetro de inmigración de la comunidad de Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, 2016, 37 p.

5. Bityukova V.R., Makhrova A.G., Sokolova E.P. Ekologicheskaya situatsiya kak faktor differentsiatsii tsen na zhil’ye v g. Moskve [State of the environment as a factor of apartment price differentiation in Moscow], Vestn. Mosk. un-ta, Ser. 5, Geography, 2006, no. 6, p. 34–41. (In Russian)

6. Burgers J., Musterd S. Understanding Urban Inequality. A model based on existing theories and an empirical illustration, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2002, vol. 26, no. 2, p. 403–413.

7. Cassiers T., Kesteloot C. Socio-spatial Inequalities and Social Cohesion in European Cities, Urban Studies, 2012, vol. 49(9), p. 1909–1924.

8. Clark W. Changing residential preferences across income, education, and age: Findings from the multi-city study of urban inequality, Urban Affairs Review, 2009, no. 44(3), p. 334–355.

9. Friedrichs J., Galster G., Musterd S. Neighbourhood effects on social opportunities: The European and American research and policy context, Housing Studies, 2003, no. 18 (6), p. 797–806.

10. Friedrischs J., Triemer S. Gespaltene Städte? Soziale und ethnische Segregation in deutschen Großstädten, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2008, 181 p.

11. Fujita K. Residential Segregation in Comparative Perspective: Making Sense of Contextual Diversity, T. Maloutas (еd.), Cities and Society, Routledge, 2012, 346 p.

12. Grzegorczyk A. Social and ethnic segregation in the Paris metropolitan area at the beginning of the 21<sup>st</sup> century, Miscellanea Geographica. Regional studies on development (MGRSD), 2013, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 20–29.

13. Häussermann H., Haila A. The European city: a conceptual framework and a normative project, Y. Kazepov (еd.), Cities of Europe: Changing Contexts, Local Arrangements and the Challenge to Urban Cohesion, Oxford, Blackwell, 2005, р. 43–65.

14. Häussermann H., Kapphan A. Berlin: Von der geteilten zur gespaltenen Stadt? Sozialräumlicher Wandel seit 1990, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2002, 292 p.

15. Kapralov A.V. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiye problemy rasseleniya immigrantov v Parizhskoy aglomeratsii [Socio-economic problems of immigrant distribution within the Paris agglomeration], Vestn. Mosk. un-ta, Ser. 5, Geogr., 2008, no. 6, p. 54–59. (In Russian)

16. Kelman Yu.F. Geograficheskiy analiz etnokul’turnogo raznoobraziya naseleniya SShA [Geographical analysis of ethnocultural diversity of the US population], Vestn. Mosk. un-ta, Ser. 5, Geogr., no. 5, 2014, p. 22–30. (In Russian)

17. Kemper F.J. Restructuring of Housing and Ethnic Segregation: Recent Developments in Berlin, Urban Studies, 1998, vol. 35, no. 10, p. 1765–1789.

18. Makhrova A.G. Osobennosti stadial’nogo razvitiya Moskovskoy aglomeratsii [Specific features of stadial development of the Moscow agglomeration], Vestn. Mosk. un-ta, Ser. 5, Geogr., 2014, no. 4, p. 10–16. (In Russian)

19. Massey D.S., Fischer J.M. How Segregation Concentrates Poverty, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2000, no. 23, p. 670–691.

20. Mkrtchyan N.V., Florinskaya Yu.F. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiye effekty trudovoy migratsii iz malykh gorodov Rossii [Socio-economic effects of labor migration from small towns of Russia], Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2016, no. 4, p. 103–123, DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2016-4-103a123. (In Russian)

21. Musterd S. Social and ethnic segregation in Europe: levels, causes and effects, Journal of Urban Affairs, 2005, no. 27, p. 331–348.

22. Patricia O.D. Black Africans in Great Britain: Spatial Concentration and Segregation, Urban Studies, 1998, vol. 35, no. 10, p. 1703–1724.

23. Patterns of ethnic segregation in London, DMAG Briefing 2005, London, 2005, 38 p.

24. Peach C. Slippery segregation: discovering or manufacturing ghettos? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2009, no. 35, p. 1381–1395.

25. Popov A.A. Territorial’naya differentsiatsiya kachestva gorodskoy sredy v Moskve [Territorial differentiation of the quality of urban environment in Moscow], Vestn. Mosk. un-ta, Ser. 5, Geogr., 2007, no. 4, p. 29–36. (In Russian)

26. Poulsen М. Using local statistics and neighbourhood classifications to portray ethnic residential segregation: A London example, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2011, vol. 38, p. 636–658.

27. Savoskul M.S. Territorial’nyye sistemy mezhdunarodnykh migratsiy naseleniya [Territorial systems of the international migrations of population], Vestn. Mosk. un-ta, Ser. 5, Geogr., 2015, no. 6, p. 11–18. (In Russian)

28. Sen F. Goldberg A. Turken in Deutschland: Leben zwischen zwei Kulturen, Miinchen, Beck, 1994, 144 p.

29. Shatilo D.P. Sotsialnaya differentsiatsiya gorodskih territorij (na primere stoimosti zhiliya I rasseleniya immigrantov) v krupnih stolitsah Evropy [Social differentiation of urban areas (using the example of housing costs and immigrant settlement) in major European capitals], Extended Abstract of Ph.D. Thesis, Moscow, 2018, 28 p.

30. Shatilo D.P. Sotsialnaya differentsiatsiya vnutrigorodskih territorij evropejskih stolits [Social differentiation of intra-city territories of European capitals], Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Direct-Media Publ., 2024, 148 p. (In Russian)

31. Sluka N.A. Geodemograficheskiye fenomeny global’nykh gorodov [Geodemographic phenomena of global cities], Smolensk, Oikumena Publ., 2009, 317 p. (In Russian)

32. Socio-Economic Segregation in European Capital Cities: East Meets West, T. Tammaru, S. Marcinczak, M. Ham van, S. Musterd (еds.), London, Routledge, 2015, 414 p.

33. Transformation of environmental problems in moscow: sociological dimension, V. Bityukova, M. Savoskul, P. Kirillov, N. Koldobskaya (еds.), Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 2016, no. 4, р. 74–87.

34. Treivish A.I. Skhemy osrednennykh regionov Rossii: popytka modelirovaniya “snizu” [Schemes of averaged regions of Russia: an attempt to model “from below”], Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Geographical series, 2017, no. 6, p. 5–18. (In Russian)

35. Van Kempen R., Şule Özüekren A. Ethnic segregation in cities: new forms and explanations in a dynamic world, Urban Studies, 1998, no. 35(10), p. 1631–1656.

36. Vendina O.I., Pain E.A. Mnogoetnichnyy gorod. Problemy i perspektivy upravleniya kul’turnym raznoobraziyem v krupneyshikh gorodakh [Multi-ethnic city. Problems and prospects for managing cultural diversity in major cities], Moscow, Sektor Publ., 2018, 184 p. (In Russian)

37. Zayonchkovskaya Zh.A., Karachurina L.B., Mkrtchyan N.V. et al. Zhenshchiny-migranty iz stran SNG v Rossii [Women migrants from the CIS countries in Russia], E.V. Tyuryukanova (еd.), Moscow, MAKS Press Publ., 2012, 119 p. (In Russian)

38. Zubarevich N.V. Strategiya prostranstvennogo razvitiya: prioritety i instrumenty [Spatial development strategy: priorities and instruments], Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2019, no. 1, p. 135–145. (In Russian)

39. Berlin.de Das offizielle Hauptstadtportal Berlin.de, URL: www.berlin.de (accessed 07. 03. 2023).

40. CACI Ltd, URL: https://www.caci.co.uk Marketing and Information solutions in the United Kingdom (accessed 15. 12. 2023).

41. El País, URL: https://elpais.com/ (accessed 12. 02. 2024).

42. GOV.UK, URL: https://www.gov.uk/ (accessed 18. 01. 2024).

43. INE – Instituto Nacional de Estadística, National Statistics Institute, URL: www.ine.es (accessed 26. 02. 2024).

44. Lelo K., Monni S., Tomassi F. Le sette Rome: La capitale delle disuguaglianze raccontata in 29 mappe, Collana, Saggine, 2021, 352, 136 p., URL: https://www.research-gate.net/publication/352679745_Le_sette_Rome_La_capitale_delle_disuguaglianze_raccontata_in_29_mappe (accessed 07. 03. 2023).

45. Mkrtchyan N.V. Migratsionnaya mobil’nost’ v Rossii: otsenki i problemy analiza [Migration mobility in Russia: assessments and problems of analysis], SPERО, 2009, no. 11, p. 149–164, URL: http://spero.socpol.ru/docs/N11_2009_08.pdf (accessеd 06/10/2018). (In Russian)

46. ONS (Office for National Statistics), URL: www.ons.gov.uk/ (accessed 08. 03. 2023).

47. Rosstat – Federal State Statistics Service of the Russian Federation, URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/ (accessed 27. 02. 2024).

48. Statistik Berlin – Brandenburg, URL: http://www.statistik-berlin-brandenburg.de/ (accessed 17. 02. 2024).

49. Statistik-Portal in Deutschland. URL: http://www.statistik-portal.de/Statistik-Portal/ (accessed 05. 01. 2023).

50. The London Index of Deprivation: An alternative to the IMD2000. Greater London Authority, London, 2008, 45 p.


Review

For citations:


Shatilo D.P. Incomes of residents in west European capitals and the immigrants’ settlement pattern. Lomonosov Geography Journal. 2025;(1):120-133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0579-9414.5.80.1.9

Views: 159


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0579-9414 (Print)