Geographical differences in the depth of integration of the world’s common markets
https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0579-9414.5.79.6.3
Abstract
Integration associations of different levels are actively developing in all regions of the world. Eight common markets, namely the European Economic Area (EEA), the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU), the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf (GCC), the East African Community (EAC), the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS), the Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR), the Central American Common Market (CACM) and the Caribbean Single Market and Economy (CSME) are central. These are integration associations based on free trade and free exchange of all factors of production. The purpose of the study was to identify geographic differences in the depth of integration within the world’s common markets. The depth of integration is studied quantitatively using the index of integration depth developed by the authors. It is based on the principle of common approach to assessing integration across four freedoms, i. e. the movement of goods, services, people and capital, represented in the aggregate index by two indicators, namely openness (the ratio of a particular flow within the common market to the size of the country) and importance (the share of flows within the common market in all external flows). This approach allows to assess the country’s participation in both regional and international movement of production factors. The study revealed that common markets formed on similar principles differ significantly in the depth of integration. In contrast to the developed European common market, participants in the Asian, African and Latin American common markets are characterized by a much more intensive exchange of production factors with third countries than with each other. This is facilitated by the regional specific features of the processes of international economic integration. Only the EEA can be classified as a common market with high level of integration; the EEU, CACM, CSME and EAC are characterised by the low level of integration; and it is very low in the GCC, MERCOSUR and ECCAS. There are many centres of diffusion of integration processes in the EEA and CSME; the CACM, EAC, GCC and MERCOSUR have one main centre and one sub-centre; and there is one supercentre in the EEU. In most cases, the centre’s level of integration is one of the lowest within the market.
About the Authors
N. M. KhasayaRussian Federation
Master student
E. A. Grechko
Russian Federation
Associate Professor, Ph.D. in Geography
References
1. Balassa B. The Theory of Economic Integration, London, George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1961, 316 p., DOI: 10.2307/1055477.
2. Dalimov R. Dynamics of International Economic Integration: Non-linear Analysis, Saarbrücken, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2010, 277 p.
3. Etzioni A. Political unification: а comparative study of leaders and forces, New York, Rinehart, 1956, 346 p., DOI: 10.2307/2092795.
4. Globalizatsiya ekonomiki i vneshneekonomicheskie svyazi Rossii [Economic globalization and foreign economic relations of Russia], I.P. Faminskii et al. (avt.), Moscow, Respublika Publ., 2004, 444 p. (In Russian)
5. Gusakov N.P., Andronova I.V. Perspektivy razvitiya Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza v kontekste vneshneekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Prospects for the development of the Eurasian Economic Union in the context of external economic security of the Russian Federation], Vestn. Rossiiskogo un-ta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Ekonomika, 2015, no. 1, p. 47–56. (In Russian)
6. Hooghe L., Marks G. A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus, British Journal of Political Science, 2009, no. 1, p. 1–23, DOI: 10.1017/S0007123408000409.
7. Khasaya N.M., Grechko E.A. Otsenka glubiny mezhgosudarstvennoi integratsii v ramkakh Evropeiskogo edinogo rynka [Assessment of the degree of interstate integration within the European single market], InterCarto. InterGIS, 2022, no. 28, p. 240–254, DOI: 10.35595/24149179-2022-1-28-240-254. (In Russian)
8. König J., Ohr R. Different Efforts in European Economic Integration: Implications of the EU Index, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 2013, no. 6, p. 1074–1090, DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12058.
9. Maksimova M.M. Osnovnye problemy imperialisticheskoi integratsii: ekonomicheskii aspect [The main problems of imperialist integration: the economic aspect], Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1971, 359 p. (In Russian)
10. Milward A.S. The European Rescue of the Nation-State, London, Routledge, 1992, 466 p.
11. Mitrany D. The Progress of International Government, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1934, 176 p., DOI: 10.2307/2603955.
12. Moiseeva D.E. Teorii evropeiskoi integratsii v poiskakh ob”yasneniya dezintegratsii [European integration theories in search of an explanation for disintegration], Analiz i prognoz. Zhurnal IMEMO RAN, 2022, no. 3, p. 37–44, DOI: 10.20542/afij-2022-3-37-44. (In Russian)
13. Moravcsik A. Did Balance of Power Politics Cause European Integration? Realist Theory Meets Qualitative Methods, Security Studies, 2013, no. 4, p. 773–790, DOI: 10.1080/09636412.2013.844511.
14. Obukhovskii V.V. Teorii mezhdunarodnoi ekonomicheskoi integratsii [Theories of international economic integration], Ekonomika XXI veka, 2007, no. 1, p. 27–45. (In Russian)
15. Otieno S.J., Kiprop S.K., Muluvi A.S. Determinants of Capital Flight in the East African Community, Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 2021, no. 10, p. 1–9, DOI: 10.7176/JESD/12-10-01.
16. Otsenka integratsionnykh protsessov EAES v sfere torgovli: 2021 [Evaluation of the EAEU integration processes in the field of trade: 2021], M.K. Glazatova et al. (avt.), Moscow, Higher School of Economics Publ., 2021, 253 p. (In Russian)
17. Pis’mennaya E.E., Ryazantsev S.V., Tikunov V.S. Geograficheskie osobennosti trudovoi migratsii v kontekste evraziiskoi integratsii [Geographical features of labor migration in the context of Eurasian integration], Vestn. Mosk. Un-ta, Ser. 5, Geogr., 2014, no. 5, p. 42–52. (In Russian)
18. Rajagopal. Dynamics of Growth in Foreign Trade in Transitional Economies: Analysis of European, Latin American, and Asian Countries, Journal of East-West Business, 2007, no. 4, p. 37–64, DOI: DOI: 10.1300/J097v13n04_03.
19. Shishkov Yu.V. [Integration maturity is an indispensable condition for the merging of national economies], Rossiya i SNG v noveishikh evropeiskikh integratsionnykh protsessakh: sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii [Russia and the CIS in the newest European integration processes: sourcebook from an international scientific conference], Moscow, Institute of World Economy and International Relations Publ., 2003, 448 p. (In Russian)
20. Shkvarya L.V. Ekonomicheskaya integratsiya v usloviyakh globalizatsii mirovoi ekonomiki: transformatsiya form i teorii [Economic integration in the context of globalization of the world economy: transformation of forms and theories], Moscow, Kompaniya Sputnik+ Publ., 2006, 92 p. (In Russian)
21. Tikunov V.S. Klassifikatsii v geografii [Classifications in geography], Moscow, Smolensk, Smolensk St. University Publ., 1997, 367 p. (In Russian)
22. Trofimova O.E. Migratsionnye protsessy v Evrosoyuze: novye vyzovy i riski [Migration processes in the European Union: new challenges and risks], Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki RAN, 2017, no. 5, p. 132–145. (In Russian)
23. Viner J. The Customs Union Issue, New York, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1950, 221 p., DOI: 10.1017/S0003055400060755.
24. Arribas I., Pérez F., Tortosa-Ausina E. Measuring International Economic Integration: Theory and Evidence of Globalization, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/16010/ (access date 24.07.2024).
25. Babar Z. Free Mobility within the Gulf Cooperation Council, CIRS Occasional Papers, URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2825921 (access date 12.12.2023).
26. Data Portal Population Division, United Nations, URL: https://population.un.org/dataportal/ (access date 10.05.2023).
27. GDP (current US$), World Bank Open Data, URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?end=2019&name_desc=false&start=1960&year_high_desc=true (access date 10.05.2023).
28. International Migrant Stock 2019, United Nations, URL: https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/undesa_pd_2019_migrant_stock_origin_destination_dataset.xlsx (access date 10.05.2023).
29. Investment Map, International Trade Center, URL: https://www.investmentmap.org/investment/time-series-bycountry (access date 10.05.2023).
30. The Trade Data You Need, When You Need It, The Observatory of Economic Complexity, URL: https://oec.world/ (access date 10.05.2023).
31. WTO Stats, World Trade Organization, URL: https://stats.wto.org/ (access date 10.05.2023).
Review
For citations:
Khasaya N.M., Grechko E.A. Geographical differences in the depth of integration of the world’s common markets. Lomonosov Geography Journal. 2024;(6):30–40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0579-9414.5.79.6.3