New rural residents and forms of their territorial organization in the Voskresensky district of the Nizhny Novgorod region

   The article examines the influence of “new rural residents” – immigrants from Nizhny Novgorod and Moscow, on a semi-peripheral district of the Non-Chernozem Region, as well as the transformation of its economy and society in connection with population replacement. Issues related to the territorial heterogeneity of the “new rural” influence are also considered. The research site, i.e. the Voskresensky district of the Nizhny Novgorod region is located 145 kilometers north of the city of Nizhny Novgorod. The presence of unique natural and symbolic resources, such as the Svetloyar Lake and the Vetluga River, attracts migrants from the large cities here.

   Research methods included in-depth and expert interviews, focus groups, participant observation and strategic sessions with local residents.

   The analysis of obtained data resulted in a typology of “new rural” residents, each type producing a different impact on the surrounding space. Key transformations of the lifestyle associated with the “new rural” are identified, namely new non-traditional types of agriculture, formation of “urban type” leisure, development of rural tourism by new-comers, complete replacement of the population in the most attractive settlements for city residents, as well as the emergence of associations of new-comers both territorial, and communities of “interests”. Key social conflicts were also identified among the new-comers and between them and indigenous residents, which limit the possibilities for development of the territory.

1. Alekseev A.I., Danilova I.A., Zubarevich N.V., Nikulin E.I. Sovremennye pereseleniya gorod – selo v Nechernozemnoj zone RSFSR (opyt izucheniya na primere Vologodskoj oblasti) [Modern rural-urban migrations in Non-Chernozem zone of the RSFSR], Vestn. Mosk. un-ta, ser. 5, Geogr., no. 1, 1979, p. 55–61. (In Russian)

2. Berry B. The counterurbanization process: urban America since 1970, Urban Affairs Annual Reviews, 1976, no. 11, p. 17.

3. Chayanov A.V. Krest’yanskoe hozyajstvo: Izbrannye Trudy [Peasant household: selected works], L.I. Abalkin (еd.), Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 1989, 492 p. (In Russian)

4. Demidova Yu.A. Fenomen daunshiftinga v Rossii na primere vnegorodskoj sredy Blizhnego Severa (po materialam ekspedicij Kostromskoj oblasti Manturovskogo rajona sel’skogo poseleniya Leont’evskoe) [Phenomenon of downshifting in Russia: a case study of out-of-town surroundings in Near North (based on materials from expedition in Leont’evskoe Rural Settlement, Manturovo District, Kostroma Region)], Sociologicheskij ezhegodnik, 2018, p. 165–174. (In Russian)

5. Elgin D. Voluntary simplicity: Toward a way of life that is outwardly simple, inwardly rich, New York, Morrow Publ., 1981.

6. Il’in. V.I. Daunshifting kak voskhodyashchaya social’naya mobil’nost’ [Downshifting as an ascending social mobility], Socio Time/Social’noe vremya, 2015, no. 1, p. 78–89. (In Russian)

7. Kozyreva L.V. Fenomen eskapizma: social’no-filosofskij analiz [Phenomenon of escapism: a socio-philosophic analysis], Extended Abstract of Ph.D. Thesis in Philosophy, Ufa, 2014, 19 p. (In Russian)

8. Lisova E.V. Daunshifting: stratifikacionnye effekty [Down-shifting: stratification effects], Ekonomicheskaya sociologiya, vol. 9, no. 2, 2008, p. 56–65. (In Russian)

9. Mezhdu domom… i domom. Vozvratnaya prostranstvennaya mobil’nost’ naseleniya Rossii [Between home… and home. Return spatial mobility of the Russian population], T.G. Nefedova, K.V. Averkieva, A.G. Mahrova (еds.), Moscow, Novyj hronograf Publ., 2016, 504 p. (In Russian)

10. Merzlyakova V.N. Al’ternativnye modeli uspeshnosti v sovremennoj kul’ture: daunshifting [Alternative models of success in modern culture: downshifting], Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya, 2008, no. 4(96), p. 33–42. (In Russian)

11. Mitchell C. Making sense of counterurbanization, Journal of rural studies, no. 5, 2004, p. 27.

12. Nefedova T.G., Pokrovskij N.E., Trejvish A.I. Urbanizaciya, dezurbanizaciya i sel’sko-gorodskie soobshchestva v usloviyah rosta gorizontal’noj mobil’nosti [Urbanization, deurbanization and rural-urban communities in conditions of horizontal mobility growth], Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, no. 12, 2015, p. 60–69. (In Russian)

13. Pivovar G.A., Alekseev A.I. Sel’sko-gorodskie vzaimosvyazi na granice s Moskovskoj aglomeraciej [Rural-urban interconnections on the border of the Moscow agglomeration], Vestn. Mosk. un-ta, ser. 5, Geogr., no. 6, 2018, p. 100–103. (In Russian)

14. Pokrovskij N.E., Makshanchikova A.Yu., Nikishin E.A. Obratnaya migraciya v usloviyah pandemicheskogo krizisa: vnegorodskie prostranstva Rossii kak resurs adaptacii [Return migration during the pandemic crisis: out-of-town territories of Russia as a resource for adaptation], Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, no. 12, 2020, p. 54–64. (In Russian)

15. Vahshtajn V.S. K probleme temporal’nyh mekhanizmov social’noj organizacii prostranstva. Analiz rezidental’noj differenciacii [To problem of temporal mechanisms of social organization of space. Analysis of residential differentiation], Sociologicheskoe obozrenie, no. 3, 2003, p. 71–83. (In Russian)

16. Vinogradskaya O.Ya. Otchego gorozhane edut v derevnyu: fenomenologiya i praktika [Why city dwellers go to the country: phenomenology and practice], Krest’yanovedenie, vol. 4, no. 3, 2019, p. 140–155. (In Russian)

17. Zadorin I., Mal’ceva D., Homyakova A., Shubina L. Al’ternativnye sel’skie poseleniya v Rossii: stihijnaya vnutrennyaya emigraciya ili osoznannyj transfer v budushchee [Alternative rural settlements in Russia: a spontaneous internal emigration or deliberate transfer to the future], Labirint, no. 2, 2014, p. 64–77. (In Russian)