Volumetric characteristics of Pacific waters in the Arctic Ocean
https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0579-9414.5.79.1.12
Abstract
Volumetric characteristics and renewal time of the Pacific waters (PW) in the Arctic Ocean were calculated based on the data of oceanographic expeditions during the 2007–2008 International Polar Year (617 stations). Isopycnal surfaces of their upper and lower boundaries (25,5 and 27,5 kg/m3, respectively), the thickness between these limits and the equivalent thickness (i. e. the specific thickness of untransformed “pure” water mass) have been determined, as well as the boundaries where the highest concentrations of silicates in the selected density interval disappears. The Pacific waters extend to the north up to the North Pole region (thickness up to 40–50 m), in the west they can be traced up to the northern part of the Laptev Sea (thickness 20–30 m), in the east they are preserved in a minimally transformed form (thickness of more than 100 m) up to the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. The characteristic depths are between 50 and 150 m. The thickest PW exceeding 150 m were found within the Beaufort Gyre. The total volume of “pure” (untransformed) Pacific waters in the Arctic Ocean was estimated at (197 ± 19) · 103 km3 or about 1,1% of the overall volume of the Arctic Ocean. If their mixing with the surrounding waters between selected isopycnic surfaces is taken into account, the volume of Pacific waters is (313 ± 16) · 103 km3, or about 1,7% of the volume of the Arctic Ocean. Taking into account the total inflow of the PW through the Bering Strait, their renewal time in the Arctic basin is estimated to be about 5–6 years.
About the Authors
Zh. M. KulikovaRussian Federation
Postgraduate student,
Department of Oceanology
S. A. Dobrolyubov
Russian Federation
Head of Department, D.Sc. in Geography,
Department of Oceanology
References
1. Alkire M.B., Morison J., Andersen R. Variability and trends in the meteoric water, sea-ice melt, and Pacific water contributions to the central Arctic Ocean, 2000–2013, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2015, vol. 120, p. 1573–1598, DOI: 10.1002/2014JC010023.
2. Alkire M.B., Rember R., Polyakov I. Discrepancy in the identification of the Atlantic/Pacific front in the central Arctic Ocean: NO versus nutrient relationships, Geophysical Research Letters, 2019, vol. 46, p. 3843–3852, DOI: 10.1029/2018GL081837.
3. Bourgain P., Gascard J.C. The Atlantic and summer Pacific waters variability in the Arctic Ocean from 1997 to 2008, Geophysical Research Letters, 2012, vol. 39, no. 5, DOI: 10.1029/2012GL051045.
4. Brugler E.T., Pickart R.S., Moore G.W.K. et al. Seasonal to interannual variability of the Pacific water boundary current in the Beaufort Sea, Progress in Oceanography, 2014, vol. 127, p. 1–20, DOI: 10.1016/j.pocean.2014.05.002.
5. Coachman L.K., Aagaard K., Tripp R.B. Bering Strait. The Regional Physical Oceanography, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, 1975, 172 p.
6. Dobrolyubov S.A., Sokov A.V. Rol’ glubinnykh vod Severnoi Atlantiki v izmenchivosti teploobmena okeana i atmosfery [The Role of the Deep Waters of the N rth Atlantic in the Variability of Ocean and Atmospheric Heat Transfer], Vestn. Mosk. un-ta, Ser. 5, Geogr., 2002, no. 6, 42–48. (In Russian)
7. Falck E., Kattner G., Budéus G. Disappearance of Pacific water in the northwestern Fram Strait, Geophysical Research Letters, 2005, vol. 32, no. 14, DOI: 10.1029/2005GL023400.
8. Hennon T.D., Danielson S.L., Woodgate R.A. et al. Mooring measurements of Anadyr Current nitrate, phosphate, and silicate enable updated Bering Strait nutrient flux estimates, Geophysical Research Letters, 2022, vol. 49, no. 16, e2022GL098908, DOI: 10.1029/2022GL098908.
9. Hu X., Myers P.G., Lu Y. Pacific Water pathway in the Arctic Ocean and Beaufort Gyre in two simulations with different horizontal resolutions, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2019, vol. 124, no. 8, p. 6414–6432.
10. Kenigson J.S., Gelderloos R., Manucharyan G.E. Vertical structure of the Beaufort Gyre halocline and the crucial role of the depth-dependent eddy diffusivity, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2021, vol. 51, no. 3, p. 845–860, DOI: 10.1175/JPO-D-20-0077.1.
11. Kodryan K.V., Kivva K.K., Zubarevich V.L., Pedchenko A.P. Water masses in the western part of the Chukchi Sea in august 2019 and their hydrochemical features, Okeanologiа, 2023, vol. 63, p. 362–374.
12. Mamayev O.I. Termokhalinnyi analiz vod Mirovogo okeana [Thermohaline Analysis of World Ocean Waters], Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat Publ., 1987, 296 p. (In Russian)
13. Pisareva M.N., Pickart R.S., Spall M.A. et al. Flow of Pacific water in the western Chukchi Sea: Results from the 2009 RUSALCA expedition, Deep Sea Research, Part I, Oceanographic Research Papers, 2015, vol. 105, p. 53–73, DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr.2015.08.011.
14. Polyakov I.V., Alkire M.B., Bluhm B.A. et al. Borealization of the Arctic Ocean in response to anomalous advection from sub-Arctic seas, Frontiers in Marine Science, 2020, vol. 7, A491, DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00491.
15. Rusanov V.P., Yakovlev N.I., Buinevich A.G. Gidrohimicheskij rezhim Severnogo Ledovitogo okeana [Hydrochemical regime of the Arctic Ocean], Tr. AAII, 1979, vol. 355, p. 144.
16. Torres-Valdés S., Tsubouchi T., Bacon S. et al. Export of nutrients from the Arctic Ocean, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2013, vol. 118, no. 4, p. 1625–1644, DOI: 10.1002/jgrc.
17. Woodgate R.A. Increases in the Pacific inflow to the Arctic from 1990 to 2015, and insights into seasonal trends and driving mechanisms from year-round Bering Strait mooring data, Progress in Oceanography, 2017, vol. 160, p. 124–154, DOI: 10.1016/j.pocean.2017.12.007.
Review
For citations:
Kulikova Zh.M., Dobrolyubov S.A. Volumetric characteristics of Pacific waters in the Arctic Ocean. Lomonosov Geography Journal. 2024;(1):141-148. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0579-9414.5.79.1.12