Preview

Lomonosov Geography Journal

Advanced search

Core-peripheral model of industrial localization: world and Russia

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0579-9414.5.78.4.1

Abstract

The article deals with the problems of industrial territorial organization in the world and Russia under the “core – periphery” concept. The study is currently important because of the lack of systematic works considering the position of countries and regions in the “core – periphery” structure and the need to elaborate a typology of regions for the purposes of industrial policy. The object of the study is the countries of the world and the regions of Russia, and the subject is the level of their industrial development. The purpose of the study is to suggest a typology of the countries of the world and the regions of Russia in the core-periphery structure of industrial space basing on the qualitative and quantitative methodology. The novelty of the study is the application of an evolutionary and multi-scale approach to the analysis of the distribution of industrial potential across the countries of the world and the subjects of the Russian Federation. The research methodology assumes a qualitative and quantitative procedure for differentiating countries and regions of Russia by industrial productivity, its share in GDP/GRP, the evolutionary stage of development (duration of the industrialization cycle) and geographical location. The main task is to check the operability of the “core – periphery” model in relation to the cycles of industrialization for the end-to-end typology of the countries of the world and the regions of Russia. Special emphasis is placed on the study of differences in industrial productivity under the influence of such geographical factors as the level of industrialization, the resource capacity of production, the scale and branch structure of industry. While analyzing industry at the country level, the emphasis is on the duration of the period of industrialization, the per capita volume of industrial production and the share of industry in GDP. Labor productivity was calculated for the regions of Russia, and the level of innovation activity was also considered. The position of a country or a region in the “core – periphery” system depends on the branch of specialization, the “age” of industry and the industrial policy of the state: the countries and regions that modernize existing funds faster or create new industries preserve their core position. Old industrial countries and regions are shifting into sub-periphery and periphery. The sub-periphery also includes industrial and agricultural regions with a high share of agriculture and small resource regions of Siberia and the Far East. The composition of the periphery is stable and includes the underdeveloped republics of the Caucasus and southern Siberia. The current results made it possible to compare the typology of countries and regions in the “core – periphery” system, while the final results could be used to adjust Russia’s industrial policy.

About the Authors

V. L. Baburin
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Professor, D.Sc. in Geography, Faculty of Geography, Department of Economic and Social Geography of Russia



M. D. Goryachko
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Associate Professor, Ph.D. in Geography, Faculty of Geography, Department of Economic and Social Geography of Russia



K. V. Demidova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Leading Engineer, Faculty of Geography, Department of Economic and Social Geography of Russia



M. A. Makushin
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Leading Engineer, Faculty of Geography, Department of Economic and Social Geography of Russia



References

1. Baburin V.L. Innovacionnye cikly v jekonomike [Innovation cycles in the economy], Moscow, URSS Publ., 2002, 120 p. (In Russian)

2. Baklanov P.Ja. Prostranstvennoe razvitie regiona: osnovnye printsipy i podkhody k analizu i otsenkam [Spatial development of a region: main principle and approaches to analysis and assessment], Social’no-jekonomicheskaja geografija, Vestnik Associacii rossijskih geografov-obshhestvovedov [Socio-economic geography, Bulletin of Russian geographers and social scientists], 2017, no. 6, p. 4–12. (In Russian)

3. Bogaturov A.D., Kosolapov N.A., Hrustalev M.A. Ocherki teorii i metodologii politicheskogo analiza mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij [Essays on theory and methodology of the political analysis of international relationships], Moscow, NOFMO Pabl., 2002, 390 p. (In Russian)

4. Buharin N.I. Problemy teorii i praktiki socializma [Problems of theory and practice of socialism], Moscow, 1989. (In Russian)

5. Buhval’d E.M. Upravlenie prostranstvennym razvitiem rossijskoj jekonomiki: celi i instrumenty [Spatial development management in Russian economy: purposes and tools], Upravlenec, 2020, vol. 11, no. 6, p. 2–14. (In Russian)

6. Dvorjadkina E.B., Lavshhenko S.P. Klassicheskie podhody k issledovaniju lokal’nyh rynkov v regional’noj jekonomike [Classical approaches to local markets research in regional economics], Estestvenno-gumanitarnye issledovanija, 2020, vol. 6, no. 32, p. 135–139. (In Russian)

7. Fenin K.V. Vremennaja razmernost’ teorij prostranstvennogo razmeshhenija jekonomiki [Temporal dimension of theories of spatial localization of the economy], Modeli, sistemy, seti v jekonomike, tehnike, prirode i obshhestve, 2013, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 121–125. (In Russian)

8. Friedmann J. Regional Planning in Post-Industrial Society: Some Policy Considerations, Journal of Farm Economics, 1963, vol. 45, no. 5, p. 1073–1079.

9. Friedmann J. Regional Planning and Nation-Building: An Agenda for International Research, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1967, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 119–129.

10. Giersch H. Aspects of growth, structural change, and employment: A Schumpeterian perspective, Kiel Working Paper, 1979, no. 89.

11. Granberg A.G. Osnovy regional’noj jekonomiki [Fundamentals of regional economics], Moscow, GU HSE Publ., 2000, 495 p. (In Russian)

12. Gricaj O.V., Ioffe G.V., Trejvish A.I. Centr i periferija v regional’nom razvitii [Centre and periphery in regional development], Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1991, 167 p. (In Russian)

13. Kiseleva N.N. Metodologija issledovanija prostranstvennoj organizacii promyshlennosti [Methodology of studying spatial industrial organization], Pjatigorsk, RIA-KMV, 2016, 92 p. (In Russian)

14. Kiseleva N.N., Orlyanskaya A.A., Bavina K.V., Borovikova N.V. Territorial’no-proizvodstvennye kompleksy kak forma prostranstvennoj organizacii proizvodstva: jevoljucija i perspektivy razvitija [Territorial and industrial complexes as a form of spatial industrial organization: evolution and prospects of development], Regional’naja jekonomika i upravlenie, 2016, no. 4(48). URL: https:// eee-region.ru/article/4813/ (In Russian)

15. Kompleksnye prostranstvennye issledovanija: Kollektivnaja monografija dlja studentov i aspirantov jekonomicheskih vuzov [Complex spatial studies: collective monography for students and Ph.D. students of economic universities], Moscow, 2019, VAVT Publ., 371 p. (In Russian)

16. Kozhieva F.A. Regional’noe razvitie v kontekste teorii poljusov rosta [Regional development in the context of growth poles theory], Fundamental’nye issledovanija, 2015, vol. 3, no. 11, p. 574–578. (In Russian) Lebedev S.D. Metodologija analiza kul’tury (social’no-kognitivnyj aspekt) [Methodology of cultural analysis (social and cognitive aspect)], Belgorod, 2003a. (In Russian)

17. Lebedev S.D. Religioznaja i svetskaja kul’tury kak tipy sistem social’nogo znanija [Religious and social culture as types of the social knowledge system], Belgorod, 2003b. (In Russian)

18. Leont’eva L.S., Konotopov A.I., Il’in A.B. Upravlenie prostranstvennymi innovacijami [Management of spatial innovations], Moscow, MIIGAiK Publ., 2016, 141 p. (In Russian)

19. Ljosh A. Prostranstvennaja organizacija hozjajstva [Spatial organization of economy], Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2007, 663 p.

20. Mesarović M., Mako D., Takahara Y. Theory of Hierarchical Multilevel Systems, New York, Academic, 1970, 294 p.

21. Min’jar-Beloruchev K.V. Jadro i periferija sistemy mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij: harakter vzaimodejstvija [Core and periphery of international relationships system: character of interaction], Novaja i novejshaja istorija, 2019, no. 6, p. 5–18. (In Russian)

22. Prigozhin I., Stengers I. Vremja. Haos. Kvant [Time. Chaos. Kvant], Moscow, Progress Publ., 1994, 266 p. (In Russian)

23. Proskurnova K.Ju. Jevoljucija vzgljadov na faktory prostranstvennogo razmeshhenija proizvoditel’nyh sil: ot material’nyh faktorov k institutam [Evolution of views on the factors of spatial distribution of productive forces: from material factors to institutions], Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii, 2021, no. 5, p. 64–71. (In Russian)

24. Rodionova I.A., Rubcov V.A., Trofimov A.M. Klassifikacija stran mira, otrazhajushhaja tendencii global’nogo processa industrializacii [Classification of the countries of the world, reflecting the trends of the global industrialization process], Vestnik RUDN: ser. Jekonomika, 2004, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 42–54. (In Russian)

25. Samojlova N.A. Genezis jekonomicheskogo prostranstva territorii [Genesis of the economic space of the territory], Arhitektura i stroitel’stvo Rossii, 2009, no. 11, p. 3–12. (In Russian)

26. Sharygin M.D., Osipov V.A. Energo-proizvodstvennye tsikly problemy teorii i praktiki [Energy production cycles problems of theory and practice], SPb., 1988, 118 p.

27. Szul R. Światowy system polityczny. Struktury i idee [World political system. Structures and ideas], Studia Społeczne, 2010, no. 2–3, p. 47–76.

28. Trejvish A.I. Neravnomernost’ i strukturnoe raznoobrazie prostranstvennogo razvitija jekonomiki kak nauchnaja problema i rossijskaja real’nost’ [Uneven and structural diversity of the spatial development of economy as a scientific problem and the Russian reality], Prostranstvennaja jekonomika, 2019, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 13–35. (In Russian)

29. Vallerstajn I. Periferija [Periphery], Jekonomicheskaja teorija, Moscow, 2004, 671 p. (In Russian)

30. Vostok / Zapad: Regional’nye podsistemy i regional’nye problemy mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij [East / West: regional subsystems and regional problems of international relationships], A.D. Voskresenskogo (ed.), Moscow, 2002, 528 p. (In Russian)

31. Vostok/Zapad: Regional’nye podsistemy i regional’nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [East / West: Regional subsystems and regional problems of international relations], A.D. Voskresenskii (ed.), Moscow, 2002, 528 p.

32. Zanadvorov V.S., Zanadvorova A.V. Jekonomika goroda [Economy of a city], Moscow, Akademkniga Publ., 2003, 272 p. (In Russian)

33. Federal agency of government statistics (Rosstat) [Electronic resource], URL: rosstat.gov.ru ( access date 12.02.2023).

34. The CIA World Factbook 2022–2023 [Electronic resource], URL: https://vk.com/doc280183192_648332391?hash=80bCkUc5N0g5V1LhzmV97CR39IC6g0yIlczWInEe31o&dl=AT7CiS5c91oWibVK17cCPKWlaNgbIDgrsVUxgxo9Z4g (access date 12.02.2023).


Review

For citations:


Baburin V.L., Goryachko M.D., Demidova K.V., Makushin M.A. Core-peripheral model of industrial localization: world and Russia. Lomonosov Geography Journal. 2023;(4):3-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0579-9414.5.78.4.1

Views: 309


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0579-9414 (Print)