Preview

Lomonosov Geography Journal

Advanced search

Age and recent evolution of landscape elements of the Kama-Keltma lowland (the Upper Kama River basin)

Abstract

The problem of identifying relic, conservative and progressive landscape elements within forest and bog geosystems of the Upper Kama River basin became resolvable as a result of complex paleogeographic investigations within the Kama-Keltma lowland. The principal components of the study were the application of the Earth remote sensing methods and identification of the relative and absolute ages (direct dating) of bog, alluvial and underlying sediments of ancient water reservoirs. The physiognomic and morphological differences between structures of different ages were determined by the degree of their resistance to exodynamic processes and climate changes. Relic landscape elements are individual structural units of the landscape (stow, groups of stows) in which natural components, or their combinations correspond to the natural conditions of ancient geosystems with a period of formation exceeding the time of formation of the landscape invariant under consideration. Their stability in time is explained by complete or partial isolation from matter and energy flows generated by adjacent geosystems. As a rule, this results from a higher location of such geosystems among other territorial complexes which makes them inaccessible to geodynamic and geochemical processes within the geosystems of middle and low levels of the landscape. Conservative and progressive landscape elements are mostly confined to low and medium terrain levels. The most dynamic geosystems, i.e. natural aquatic complexes, are located at the lowest elevations of the relief. The studies have shown that conservative landscape elements could not be identified using the pre-established criteria for the most common landscape elements due to their large proportion in the structure of geosystems of different ages. These geosystems were defined as natural territorial complexes that do not meet the criteria for being relic or progressive landscape elements. Despite the seeming simplicity of solving the problem, the objective identifying of such geosystems will depend on the objective identifying of elements “from the past” and “from the future”, i. e. proper identification of the boundaries of relic and progressive landscape elements.

About the Authors

N. N. Nazarov
Perm State University
Russian Federation

Department of Physical Geography and Landscape Ecology

Professor, D.Sc. in Geography



I. F. Frolova
Perm State University
Russian Federation

Department of Physical Geography and Landscape Ecology

Associate Professor, Ph.D. in Geography



References

1. Alexandrovskii A.L. Phases and rates of soil evolution within river floodplains in the center of the Russian Plain, Eurasian Soil Science, 2004, no. 11, p. 1285–1295.

2. Alexandrovskii A.L., Glasko M.P. Vzaimodejstvie alljuvial’nyh i pochvoobrazovatel’nyh processov na raznyh etapah formirovanija pojm ravninnyh rek v golocene (na primere rek central’noj chasti Vostochno-Evropejskoj ravniny) [Interaction of alluvial and soil formation processes at different stages of the floodplain’s development during the Holocene (the rivers in the central part of the East European Plain as an example)], Geomorfologija, 2014, no. 4, p. 3–17. (In Russian)

3. Eremeeva E.A., Leonova N.B. [Relic communities of island pine forests in the landscapes of the Eurasian steppes], Stepi Severnoj Evrazii: materialy VIII Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma [Steppes of Northern Eurasia], 2018, p. 375– 378. (In Russian)

4. Genkel’ A.A. Bolota Permskoj oblasti [Bogs in the Perm oblast], Uchenye zapiski Permskogo universiteta. Biogeografija i kraevedenie, 1974, vol. 131, no. 2, p. 4–85. (In Russian)

5. Glebov F.Z., Dzhanseitov K.K. O skorosti zabolachivanija Zapadno-Sibirskoj ravniny [On the rate of swamping of the West Siberian Plain], Geografija i prirodnye resursy, 1983, no. 3, p. 144–146. (In Russian)

6. Gorchakovskij P.L. Lesnye oazisy Kazahskogo melkosopochnika [Forest oases of the Kazakh Upland], Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1987, 158 p. (In Russian)

7. Horoshev A.V. Landshaftnye uslovija stabil’nosti fitoprodukcionnogo funkcionirovanija v Ajtuarskoj stepi (Juzhnyj Ural) [Landscape conditions of stable phytoproduction in the Aituar steppe (the Southern Urals)], Vestn. Mosk. un-ta, Ser. 5, Geogr., 2021, no. 2, p. 82–91. (In Russian)

8. Isachenko A.G. Landshaftovedenie i fiziko-geograficheskoe rajonirovanie [Landscape studies and physical-geographical zoning], Moscow, Vysshaja shkola Publ., 1991, 336 p. (In Russian)

9. Kalinin N.A. Uslovija formirovanija i prognoz sil’nyh osadkov s pomoshh’ju indeksov neustojchivosti atmosfery na territorii Ural’skogo Prikam’ja [Conditions of formation and forecast of heavy precipitation with the help of indices of atmospheric instability in the territory of the Ural Prikamye], Geograficheskij vestn., 2019, no. 4(51), p. 96–112, DOI: 10.17072/2079-7877-2019-4-96-112.

10. Karamysheva Z.V., Rachkovskaja E.I. Botanicheskaja geografija stepnoj chasti Central’nogo Kazahstana [Botanical geography of the steppe part of Central Kazakhstan], Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1973, 250 p. (In Russian)

11. Kvasov D.D. Pozdnechetvertichnaja istorija krupnyh ozer i vnutrennih morej Vostochnoj Evropy [Late Quaternary history of large lakes and inland seas of Eastern Europe], Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1975, 280 p. (In Russian)

12. Larsen E., Fredin O., Jensen M., Kuznetsov D., Lysa A., Subetto D. Subglacial sediment, proglacial lake-level and topographic controls on ice extent and lobe geometries during the Last Glacial Maximum in NW Russia, Quaternary Science Reviews, 2014, vol. 92, p. 369–387.

13. Lavrov A.S., Potapenko L.M. Neoplejstocen severo-vostoka Russkoj ravniny [Neopleistocene of the northeast of the Russian Plain], Moscow, Ajerogeologija Publ., 2005, 348 p. (In Russian)

14. Lysa A., Larsen E., Buylaert J.-P., Fredin O., Jensen M., Kuznetsov D. Late Pleistocene stratigraphy and sedimentary environments of the Severnaya Dvina-Vychegda region in northwestern Russia, Boreas, 2014, vol. 43, p. 759–779.

15. Milkov F.N. Problema reliktov v fizicheskoj geografii [The problem of relics in physical geography], Izvestija AN SSSR, Ser. Geograficheskaja, 1989, no. 6, p. 5–17. (In Russian)

16. Nazarov N.N. K voprosu o vremeni poslednego massovogo sprjamlenija izluchin na verhnej Kame [On the question of time of the last mass rectification of bends on the Upper Kama River], Vestn. Udmurtskogo un-ta, Ser. Biologija, Nauki o Zemle, 2014, no. 2, p. 105–111. (In Russian)

17. Nazarov N.N. Plejstocenovye perestrojki rechnyh rusel i sovremennoe razvitie pojmenno-ruslovyh kompleksov verhnej Kamy [Pleistocene reorganization and recent development of river channels in the Upper Kama River basin], Geomorfologiya, 2017, no. 3, p. 88–100, DOI: 10.7868/S0435428117030087.

18. Nazarov N.N., Chernov A.V., Kopytov S.V. Perestrojki rechnoj seti Severnogo Predural’ja v pozdnem plejstocene i golocene [River’s network rearrangements of the Nor thern Pre-Urals in the Late Pleistocene and Holocene], Geograficheskij vestn., 2015, no. 3(34), p. 26–34. (In Russian)

19. Nazarov N.N., Kopytov S.V. Ispol’zovanie dannyh distancionnogo zondirovaniya v izuchenii perestroek rechnoj seti (na primere verhnej Kamy) (The use of remote sensing data in the study of river network restructuring (by example of the Upper Kama), Sovremennye problemy distancionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2019b, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 105–117, DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2019-16-1-105-117.

20. Nazarov N.N., Kopytov S.V. Rekonstrukciya etapov razvitiya Kel’tminskoj lozhbiny po geomorfologicheskim dannym (Predural’e) (Reconstructing the evolution stages of the Kel’tma hollow from geomorphological data (Pre-Ural Region), Geografiya i prirodnye resursy, 2019a, no. 3, p. 154–164. (In Russian)

21. Nazarov N.N., Kopytov S.V., Chernov A.V. K voprosu o vozraste pojm preryvisto-dinamicheskogo razvitija (na primere verhnej Kamy) [On the age of floodplains of discontinuous and dynamic development (case study of the Upper Kama River)], Geograficheskij vestn., 2016, no. 3(38), p. 15–27. (In Russian)

22. Nejshtadt M.I. [The formation and rate of development of the bog process], Nauchnye predposylki osvoenija bolot Zapadnoj Sibiri [Scientific prerequisites for the development of swamps in Western Siberia], 1977, p. 39–47. (In Russian)

23. Nikolaev V.A. O vozraste landshaftov [About the age of landscapes], Vestn. Mosk. un-ta, Ser. 5, Geogr., 1976, no. 2, p. 45–55. (In Russian)

24. Polynov B.B. Geograficheskie raboty [Geographic works], Moscow, Geografgiz Publ., 1952, 400 p. (In Russian)

25. Polynov B.B. Landshaft i pochva [Landscapes and soil], Priroda, 1925, no. 1–3, p. 73–84. (In Russian)

26. Prognoz klimaticheskoj resursoobespechennosti VostochnoEvropejskoj ravniny v uslovijah poteplenija XXI veka [Forecast of the climatic resource availability of the East European Plain under climate warming in the XXI century], Moscow, MAKS Press Publ., 2008, 292 p. (In Russian)

27. Rostom G.R. [Relict landscapes in the forest-steppe zone of the East European Plain], Stepi Severnoj Evrazii: materialy I Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma [Steppes of Northern Eurasia], 1997, p. 39–40. (In Russian)

28. Sukachjov V.N. Izbrannye trudy v treh tomah, t. 2, Problemy bolotovedenija, paleobotaniki i paleogeografii [Selected works in three volumes, vol. 2, Problems of bog science, paleobotany and paleogeography], Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1973, 352 p. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Nazarov N.N., Frolova I.F. Age and recent evolution of landscape elements of the Kama-Keltma lowland (the Upper Kama River basin). Lomonosov Geography Journal. 2022;(5):41-51. (In Russ.)

Views: 136


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0579-9414 (Print)